Search for: "GLASS v. STATE" Results 681 - 700 of 1,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2020, 12:58 am by Donald Dinnie
The United Kingdom Court of Appeal in Pilkington v CGU [2004] held that the risk of future damage doesn’t mean that glass panes installed in the glass roof of the Eurostar terminal at Waterloo station were actually damaged (although they were prone to fracture). [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 11:55 am by South Florida Lawyers
USPlate’s letter specifically stated: “This claim is now closed. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The ECtHR found violations under Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) and 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) ECHR (right to fair trial), in relation to the conditions of their transportation and detention in the courthouse, their pre-trial detention, the treatment during the court hearings (being exposed to public view in a glass dock surrounded by armed police), and restrictions to legal assistance. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
Minnesota seems to have accepted § 772(a) as well, see Glass Service Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
[UPDATE: Reader CW notes that Minnesota seems to have accepted § 772(a) as well, see Glass Service Co. v. [read post]