Search for: "General Corporation v. General Motors Corporation"
Results 681 - 700
of 865
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2009, 7:44 am
The Havey court noted that “[i]n that case … the corporation was in the business of producing submarines. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:17 pm
Suzuki Motor Corporation) the Plaintiff was injured in a 1994 motor vehicle collision. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
In Hall v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:22 pm
In today's case (Wittenberg v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:02 pm
The Kelo and Poletown takings occurred in large part because politically influential corporations (GM and Pfizer) lobbied for them in the first place. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:49 am
App. at 553) The general rule throughout the United States is that an officer of a corporation who takes part in the commission of a tort of gross negligence or reckless indifference by the corporation may be personally liable. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 8:46 am
Feinberg signed last week's orders setting pay levels for executives at Bank of America, AIG, Chrysler Financial, Citigroup, GMAC, General Motors and Chrysler. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:37 am
He described the board of directors at General Motors this way: if ever a board of directors needed shuffling, it was GM's, which had been utterly docile in the face of mounting evidence of looming disaster. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:01 am
Regal-Beloit Corporation; Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:04 am
Reinsurance Corporation v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:44 am
Motors Insurance Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:12 am
For over 50 years spanning 3 generations, we have obtained results for satisfied clients. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:24 pm
General Motors Corp., 148 Mich. 147 (1995), should be applied to a discrimination case brought under MCL § 37.2801(2); and (2) whether the Court of Appeals correctly decided that this alleged violation occurred in Oakland County, where the decision to terminate the plaintiff was made, rather than in Wayne County where the plaintiff worked. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:17 am
In Indergard v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Aon Corporation et al. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 4:46 am
General Motors Corporation and Suzuki Motor Corporation settled their respective claims before trial. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:10 pm
Weekly D1892bCorporations -- Indemnity -- Contracts -- Trial court properly entered summary judgment for former vice-president and general manager of defendant corporation's agency on her claim for indemnification for attorney's fees and costs incurred in her successful defense of criminal charges of money laundering and conspiracy to launder money while acting in her capacity as vice-president -- Summary judgment for plaintiff on indemnification claim was proper because… [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 10:58 am
Standing isn't supposed to permit generalized grievances to be pursued in court, and so I see that as a problem if Supreme Court review is sought...but many of the plaintiffs here are states, who get that specialized standing as a result of Massachusetts v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:44 am
HIV/HCV/AIDS review Last Act: 09/16/09 signed chap.419420
A1396
O'Mara -- Makes technical amendments to 2008 chapter permitting use of certain parkland by the city of Elmira BLURB : Elmira; Mark Twain golf course Last Act: 09/16/09 signed chap.420421
A1627C
Zebrowski (MS) -- Prohibits any person, firm or corporation from deceptively soliciting vehicle warranty policies by written solicitation or telemarketing to owners of motor vehicles… [read post]
