Search for: "Givens v. Clarke"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2016, 4:04 pm
Yvette Clarke, D-New York.It sounds like Mr. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:18 am
Fine is presiding over State of Texas v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
” Nice try, but no banana (AMS Neve v Heritage Audio [2020] EWHC 1876 (June 2020))The only non pay-walled coverage I can find is via Lexology, I cannot find this case on Bailii! [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
Clark and J.W. [read post]
The appearance of a substantial defence in possession claims, and property guardians and possession.
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
In Westminster CC v Clarke (1992) 2 AC 288 (a hostel for the homeless), exclusive possession was found to be inconsistent with the purposes for which the Council provided the accommodation. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:41 am
Case Name: Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:41 am
Case Name: Smith v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 4:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 6:15 am
Auth., 745 F.2d 904, 908 (4th Cir. 1984); Clark v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:54 am
In Carpenter v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 12:03 pm
Cooper v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:41 am
Justice Kennedy’s current disapproval of the merits-first process is particularly ironic given that only ten years ago he authored Saucier v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:16 am
Dean v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
Panellists are Mr Justice Arnold, Chris Wadlow, Phillip Johnson and Birgit Clark. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:58 am
Petsafe Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Welsh Ministers [2010] EWHC 2908 (Admin) (16 November 2010): Do pets have human rights? [read post]
21 May 2018, 9:53 am
Clark, 581 U.S. ___ (2017).) [read post]
Symposium: Supreme Court disavows precedent, refusing to protect women from abortion industry abuses
27 Jun 2016, 11:08 am
In January 1973, in Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:46 am
As Clarke Forsythe documents in his momentous book, Abuse of Discretion, on the making of Roe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:23 am
” A trial court’s grant of a CPLR 4401 motion for judgment as a matter of law is appropriate where the trial court finds that, upon the evidence presented, there is no rational process by which the fact trier could base a finding in favor of the nonmoving party'” (Geeta Temple-Ashram v Satyanandji, 142 AD3d 1132, 1134, quoting Szczerbiak v Pilat, 90 NY2d 553, 556; accord Clarke v Phillips, 112 AD3d 872, 874). [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 1:06 pm
Winn-Dixie Stores and Robles v. [read post]
