Search for: "Goodwill v. Goodwill"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 10:37 am
In Prince of Peace Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 4:10 am
An example of this is the recent case of Lagunitas Brewing Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 10:06 pm
See Crazy Horse Too A Gentleman's Club v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 11:12 am
See, for example, Opposition No. 118,181, Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:38 am
Am. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 4:49 am
As such, this would be capable of damaging the plaintiff's goodwill. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:36 pm
The case cite is Campagnolo S.R.L. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 9:07 am
Case citation: Amazon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
I had that same trepidation when I picked up Lester Building Systems v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 7:22 am
Advanced Oral Technologies, L.L.C v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:18 am
Møller v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:50 pm
Or, to put the question another way, in a multicultural country where a kaleidoscopic range of beliefs and practices are accepted, for the sake of convenience and goodwill, as religions, will the meritorious content of each and every one of these be beyond argument? [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v Shaun Coley (trading as BMW Mini Gearbox Centre) is an extempore ruling of Judge Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, late last month, which this Kat spotted as a note on the Lawtel subscription-only service. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:33 pm
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Viacom International, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:34 am
Hershey Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
Topek, LLC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 10:55 am
Joseph Paul Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
Tata Sons Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm
The applicant relied upon the ‘extended’ form of passing off (referred to in Chocosuisse Union des fabricants suisses de chocolat & Ors v Cadbury Ltd. [1999] EWCA Civ 856), which enables several traders to have rights over a sign which has acquired a reputation on the market (and whereby - as per the UK law of passing off - such notional use by another has constituted a misrepresentation, and damage was caused).The BoA had previously found that, whilst there was reputation… [read post]
