Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement" Results 681 - 700 of 946
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Taking this springboard for granted is pure hindsight. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
 A third case to watch out for is Novartis's Aclasta (zoledronic acid) patent with Swiss-type claims for the use of zoledronic acid in a once-yearly i/v administration for the treatment of osteoporosis. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
” At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm by Hannah Kris
.: The House Committee on Homeland Security will convene a hearing entitled “Understanding the Importance of DHS Preparedness Grants: Perspectives From the Field. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While applicable Agencies are expected to act as quickly as possible to comply with President Trump’s orders, various statutory and procedural requirements almost certainly will limit both the relief granted and the speed with which the Agencies can grant the relief. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 1:44 am
The retired schoolteacher is the author of five books and thirty magazine articles, and has received the National Press Award. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
Charlotte‑Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971), (the famous school busing decision), Griggs v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Sponsors and fiduciaries of private sector employer or union sponsored plans struggled to obtain information and cooperation from Anthem necessary to evaluate and fulfill their health plans’ HIPAA obligations as well as the fiduciary responsibility requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
§ 1396a(a)(23), but grant states broad authority to exclude providers for violating state or federal requirements, 42 U.S.C. [read post]