Search for: "Grant v. Department of Corrections" Results 681 - 700 of 3,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  (As the Office of Legal Counsel has explained, the appointment process can largely be delegated to officials other than the head of the Department, such as the Human Resources Department, as long as the “ultimate decision” on the appointment remains with the head of the Department. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 08, 2008 US v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
However qualified immunity excused two correctional officers who merely worked in the commissary.In Eberle v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am by Maria Roche
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 - Read Judgment  Further to our recent post on the deportation of foreign criminals, the matter has once again come to the attention of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am by Aaron Tang
” If the third-party doctrine is correct (see, United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am by Nico Cordes
It is therefore not the task of the Board to decide whether the Examining Division reached the correct decision in refusing postponement, but simply to judge whether it used its discretion in accordance with the right principles and in a reasonable manner (see e.g. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am by Nico Cordes
It is therefore not the task of the Board to decide whether the Examining Division reached the correct decision in refusing postponement, but simply to judge whether it used its discretion in accordance with the right principles and in a reasonable manner (see e.g. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 8:21 pm by Larry
Capella Sales & Services Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am by MBettman
The trial court granted summary judgment to the officers on the no-proximate-cause rule formulated in Lewis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
Therefore, if the trial court chooses to grant the Patients' motion to correct error based on their claim of newly discovered evidence, it should order a new trial on only their battery claim.NFP civil opinions today (7): William G. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
  I am therefore pleased that the Court, in an opinion by Justice Breyer, recognized that the real issue was tangential to the issue on which the Court had granted certiorari, and that the majority both addressed the real issue and reached the correct result. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:54 am by MBettman
As such, WBNS reasonably relied on the information provided by the Columbus Police Department, and when the Columbus Police corrected the information provided to WBNS, WBNS corrected its report. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Suppiah v Kalish, 76 AD3d 829, 832 [1st Dept 2010] [reversing grant of summary judgment on malpractice claim].) [read post]