Search for: "Gregory v. United States" Results 681 - 700 of 991
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 pm by Alan Horowitz
On January 17, the Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm by David Lat
Thomas [Supreme Court of the United States via SCOTUSblog] Maples v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 am by Jay McDaniel
For United States Dept. of Justice, Interested Party: Susan Frances Knight, U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:07 pm by Kedar
EPA and United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:14 am by WSLL
Westling, Senior Assistant Appellate CounselRepresenting Appellee (Plaintiff): Gregory A. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:15 am by WSLL
Dep’t of Revenue; Dep’t of Revenue v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:34 am by Thomas Merrill
Wednesday’s oral argument in PPL Montana v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:35 am by WSLL
Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Gregory A. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
United States Soccer Federation denies extending antitrust immunity to USSF in regulating professional soccer, 18 SPORTS LAWYERS JOURNAL 325 (2011)Caitlin M. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:19 am by WSLL
Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Gregory A. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:50 am by Mary L. Dudziak
United States, 1949 (Roundtable)Chair: Ellen Schrecker, Yeshiva University Lisa Davis, Independent ScholarBarbara Falk, Canadian Forces College / RMCFred Jerome, Independent ScholarAmerican Slavery: Reinforcements and ReactionsPeter Wirzbicki, New York University, “Transcendentalism and the Fugitive Slave Act”Vanessa Varin, Louisiana State University, “Myth and Power: The Relationship Between Fiction and Capital Justice in the Early… [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:32 am by WSLL
Likewise, the United States Constitution does not require counsel for indigent defendants seeking post-conviction relief. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Like the United States Supreme Court, there are few cases the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is required to hear; instead, the court decides, at its discretion, which appeals from the intermediate appellate courts it wants to hear. [read post]