Search for: "HARDING v. STATE"
Results 681 - 700
of 18,139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2023, 11:41 am
Insurers would be required to pay Appian $500 million if the state supreme court rules that Pegasystems should have won. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Wet, wet, mop, mop, scrub really hard.' The goal? [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:26 pm
If Justice Thomas were really doing the bidding of Harlan Crow, he probably would not have voted to overrule Roe v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
Master Bell stated that he “thought long and hard about whether or not to strike out Ms O’Neill’s action in the light of this jurisprudence and came close to doing so” [46]. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:27 am
This likely explains why Apple is working hard to find a basis under federal law to challenge the scope of the injunction. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
The Justices have only themselves to blame for the presence of United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 1:54 pm
What's left of the dormant Commerce Clause after National Pork Producers v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:13 am
For example, in Unico Mechanical Corporation, the GAO sustained the protest where the agency unreasonably assessed a weakness (1) notwithstanding the proposal met the solicitation’s stated minimum requirement, and (2) for a mistaken finding that the offeror did not address a feature in its proposal. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:43 am
In the first case, Power Integrations v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
And in 2001 the Supreme Court ruled in Alexander v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
Today, the federal system and virtually all states allow VISs in the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 1:38 pm
And federal courts may be less political than state courts, since federal judges are not elected, are hard to remove from office, and are often not as connected to local political organizations as state judges. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 8:26 am
Wood noted that, under the precedent of the Supreme Court case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm
First, this authority will allow the Commission to protect consumers, including by issuing straightforward, clear rules to prevent Internet service providers from engaging in practices harmful to consumers, competition, and public safety, and by establishing a uniform, national regulatory approach rather than disparate requirements that vary state-by-state. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:03 pm
, United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm
It's a prosecutor-v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 11:52 am
In Texas v. [read post]
