Search for: "HUGHES v. HUGHES" Results 681 - 700 of 3,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2023, 2:28 pm by Chiara Gallo
 Patents Rose Hughes discussed the interpretation of G2/21 by the Board of Appeal in the T 0116/18 case and the fact that this interpretation considers the rejection of the language of plausibility, the divergence between the EPO and the UK courts and what it requires with regards to the disclosure of a technical effect relied on for inventive step. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
Merrill is the Charles Evans Hughes Professor at Columbia Law School. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 2:39 am by Stephen Pitel
Two judges (Sumption, Hughes) reject that approach and adopt a more narrow meaning of damage in the forum (it must be direct damage only). [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:49 am by INFORRM
  This was first posted on 26 February 2010 and is the last of a three part post in which Hugh Tomlinson QC considers the future of the law of privacy in the UK. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 11:42 am
The British Columbia Court of Appeal considered this issue in Hughes v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:01 am by Daniel Schwartz
It touches on a subject that I covered in some prior posts arising from the case of Curry v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 9:43 am by Cooper, Adel & Associates
This comes on the heels of Ohio’s continued unwillingness to follow the decision in Hughes v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
From the recently filed West Virginia case of Helmburg v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:24 pm
Shaw; and The International Court of Justice, by Hugh Thirlway Jochen A. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 5:49 am by Magdaleen Jooste
Rose Hughes brought part 2 of Illumina v MGI, “Has the UK lost its way on the doctrine of equivalents? [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am by INFORRM
  It includes the intrinsic worth of human beings shared by all people as well as the individual reputation of each person built upon his or her own individual achievements” (Khumalo v Holomisa [2002] ZACC 12 [27] ) There is social value in ensuring that false statements which adversely impact on a person’s reputation are corrected. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Although in Von Hannover v Germany ((2004) 40 EHRR 1) there was an element of harassment, a series of subsequent cases have found violations resulting from [read post]