Search for: "Harding v. Harding" Results 681 - 700 of 25,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2011, 8:59 pm by Lawrence Solum
As a normative matter, the Court’s role in the resolution of this case is hard to justify or explain. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:32 pm
" Given the inherent dangerousness of most high-speed chases, this flat rule -- the "Scott v . [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 7:36 pm by Gerard Magliocca
First, the Court worked very hard to say that Justice Bushrod Washington did not contradict the dual sovereignty exception in his opinion for the Court in Houston v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 8:34 am by Howard Wasserman
It is hard to take that seriously after today's decision in Franchise Tax Bd. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 8:17 am by Carissa Byrne Hessick
Inspired by this week's SCOTUS oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 5:47 pm
But in these cases, I have a hard time imagining the Court applying as deferential a test as it applied in Gonzales v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here is a short, pungent and dispositive decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department in Zito v Fischbein Badillo Wagner Harding  ; 2011 NY Slip Op 00285 ; Decided on January 20, 2011 Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here is a short, pungent and dispositive decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department in Zito v Fischbein Badillo Wagner Harding ; 2011 NY Slip Op 00285 ; Decided on January 20, 2011 Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 10:17 am
And some could be alleviated through ordinary Congressional legislation, the advise and consent process, the Twenty-Fifth Amendment, and so on.In assessing whether a "hard-wired" feature of the Constitution is really "hard-wired" or not, we have to ask what it would take, short of Article V amendment, for various parties to agree to work around it. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:32 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jeleniewicz v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1163 (23 October 2008) James v Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1158 (23 October 2008) Harding v Revenue & Customs [2008] EWCA Civ 1164 (23 October 2008) Parris v Williams [2008] EWCA Civ 1147 (23 October 2008) Ashwell Property Group Plc & Anor v Cambridge City Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1151 (22 October 2008) High… [read post]