Search for: "Hernandez v. Doe"
Results 681 - 700
of 733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
Relying on Anderson, California courts have shifted the burden of proof to employers when inadequate records prevent employees from proving their claims for unpaid overtime hours (Hernandez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 2:54 pm
Two new petitions granted The Court added these two cases to its argument schedule for the fall: Hernandez v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
The conservative upstate court, whose judges were elected by voters in Western New York and four of whom were appointed to the Appellate Division by Governor George Pataki, concluded that the 2006 decision by New York's highest court, Hernandez v. [read post]
11 May 2008, 11:32 am
Llamas-Hernandez, 659 S.E.2d 79 (N.C. [read post]
5 May 2008, 9:24 am
In UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
EVIDENCEUnited States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531, 541, 105 S. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:21 am
Hernandez-Montez, 2008 U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:12 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Celso Hernandez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 8:43 am
Hemandez v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:10 pm
Here the above definition, didn't fit the actual situation since the registration clerk "received [her] wages or salary" from the hospital, not VIP, the Entity.As the 9th Circuit wrote: That VIP reimbursed [the hospital] does not change that fact that [the hospital] was the entity paying Hernandez's salary and that, therefore, Hernandez was not a VIP employee as defined by the insurance contract. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
" (Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:56 pm
Justice McNamara cited Martinez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:38 pm
Hernandez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:51 am
US v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:21 am
Hernandez Covington (M.D. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 2:15 am
See Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 9:39 am
The case is Martinez v. [read post]
