Search for: "Herring v. Reed" Results 681 - 700 of 1,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2012, 2:02 am
, and considers whether being a parent makes her a better child care lawyer, in her post Parent Lawyers. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 am by Aurora Barnes
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:57 am
Child adopted by her aunt. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on Thursday 20 June 2024 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) handed down a unanimous judgment in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Styen J handed down judgement in the case of Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB). [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:55 am by Charles Sartain
They are the parties in Escondido v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 5:38 pm
  Left to right:  Sandy Gage, Len Levy, Ken Reed and Alex PolskySandy Gage if can't get out of the pattern that you're in (in a specialty) then you unnecessarily limit your possibilities he got called for insurance bad faith cases because he handled them how did Lee Jay Berman (non-lawyer) become so respected in a field dominated by lawyers trust your instincts do you shudder when you hear about the… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:26 am by David Kopel
" In the Reporter's first issue from Rutgers, the lead article was Ginsburg's analysis of the Supreme Court's recent decision supporting women's rights, in Reed v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:45 am by Lorene Park
Specifically, the supervisor allegedly said the housekeeper was too “mannish” and that the supervisor didn’t want to work with her because she “acted too manly” (Reed v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm by Howard Wasserman
  I would point to a similar example from last term--Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As I shall explain, that aspect of Braidwood finds support in the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Burwell v. [read post]