Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 681 - 700
of 4,265
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2020, 8:44 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 8:42 am
The United States of America (‘US’), one of the treaty’s signatories, has adopted Article 1(A) of the Convention without any substantial reservation, understanding or declaration (‘RUDs’). [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:00 am
In 2018, the United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:14 am
What are a Copyright Holder’s Exclusive Rights? [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 11:49 am
In the seminal case of Dames & Moore v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
OEIGWG CHAIRMANSHIP SECOND REVISED DRAFT 06.08.2020 LEGALLY BINDING INSTRUMENT TO REGULATE, IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, THE ACTIVITIES OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS ENTERPRISES Preamble The State Parties to this (Legally Binding Instrument),Reaffirming the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations; Recalling the nine core International Human Rights Instruments adopted by the United Nations, and the eight… [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:33 am
In United States of America v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
Holder and Citizens United to the larger idea of weaponizing free speech. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
Mexico has just adopted a terrible new copyright law, thanks to pressure from the United States (and specifically from the copyright maximalists that hold outsized influence on US foreign policy). [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Holder, which advanced the false assertion that voters of color are no longer subject to systematic efforts to suppress their votes; Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
COVID-19 has highlighted the lack of resources allocated to many communities in the United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
To this, one may point out to what AG Szpunar wrote in the very opening of his Opinion in Ziggo [at [3]; Katpost here], an approach which the CJEU subsequently endorsed:The European Commission, whose opinion appears to me to be shared by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, contends that liability for sites of this type is a matter of copyright application, which can be resolved not at the level of EU law but under the domestic legal systems of the Member… [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 1:12 pm
United States strengthens the case against Trump's sweeping use of Section 212(f)—here and here: Trump v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 6:55 am
However, the courts in Campbell v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:54 pm
Congress is ultimately responsible for creating a permanent solution for Dreamers to remain lawfully in the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 8:41 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997.… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:46 am
Ass’n of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:05 pm
The parties in Harvard v. [read post]
