Search for: "Howell v. Howell" Results 681 - 700 of 974
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2011, 5:31 am by Ted Frank
As if prompted by my Tuesday post on the case, yesterday the California Supreme Court correctly ruled on Howell, which will save consumers billions of dollars a year on insurance costs at the expense of attorney windfalls. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:16 pm
Here's something I haven't seen that often.It's a unanimous opinion by the California Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
08/18/2011 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA REBECCA HOWELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 7:06 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Howell handed the Secret Service and the Obama Administration a setback this week, ruling that White House visitor logs are agency records subject to being produced under the Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C. sec. 552] unless shielded by one of the Act's exemptions.The issue of public access to visitors lists has  plagued both the Bush and Obama White House occupancies (see "TUOL" posts 9/7/09, 7/23/09), but in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:55 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
(citing Mitchell, 246 S.W.2d at 168, and Howell v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:14 am by Ted Frank
" Is Hamilton Meat liable for $200,000, or for Howell's actual damages? [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, Dalley establishes that [**11] Harris failed to make any evidentiary showing that the alleged conduct caused any mental or physical symptom or injury that would indicate the existence of severe emotional distress (see Howell v New York Post Co., 81 NY2d 115, 612 N.E.2d 699, 596 N.Y.S.2d 350, supra; see also Elbogen v Esikoff, 266 AD2d 15, 697 N.Y.S.2d 614 [1st Dept 1999]). [read post]