Search for: "Hurley v. Hurley"
Results 681 - 700
of 880
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
In Mohamad v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am
Jackler and Bowie v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:29 am
See, Shell Oil Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am
Hurley and Moore v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2012] EWHC 201- read judgment This judgment, the latest in an expanding list of decisions on challenges to the Coalition government’s spending cuts, is an interesting example of judicial restraint and deference to the government on issues of macro-policy, at a time when the extent of judicial intervention into political decision-making is the subject of much debate in the legal profession and academia,… [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:38 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crawford & Anor v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 (17 February 2012) Oxford City Council v Basey [2012] EWCA Civ 115 (15 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) AB & Anor v Home Office [2012] EWHC 226 (QB) (16 February 2012) Gold & Anor v Cox & Anor [2012] EWHC 272 (QB) (17 February 2012) Independent Police Complaints Commission v Warner & Ors… [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am
In the courts Hurley & Moore, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation & Skills [2012] EWHC 201 (Admin) (17 February 2012). [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm
Elias LJ assessed the fees scheme not simply against the ECHR by also against the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) on the basis that the Court of Human Rights has, in recent cases, considered ECHR rights in light of the provisions of the Covenant (see Demir & Baykara v Turkey (2009) at [85] and Opuz v Turkey (2010) at [185]). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:54 am
CEATS v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:56 pm
(Cf Hurley v Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc., 515 US 557, 574 [1995] ["the point of all speech protection ... is to shield just those choices of content that in someone's eyes are misguided, or even hurtful. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:56 pm
(Cf Hurley v Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc., 515 US 557, 574 [1995] ["the point of all speech protection ... is to shield just those choices of content that in someone's eyes are misguided, or even hurtful."]; Texas v Johnson, 491 US 397, 414[1989] ["If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:36 pm
As Greenwire’s Lawrence Hurley reports, the Wal-Mart v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:39 am
And Lawrence Hurley of Greenwire reports on the effects that Wal-Mart v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:36 am
If, as in Blanch [v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
In Grundberg v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:07 pm
Unlike Summers v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am
Lawrence Hurley of Greenwire has coverage of the latter two cases, from which Justice Breyer is recused. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:03 am
Supreme Court oral argument in PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
” Barbara Leonard of Courthouse News Service and Lawrence Hurley of Greenwire (via E&E Publishing) provide more background on the case. [read post]
