Search for: "I v. B"
Results 681 - 700
of 27,601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2023, 9:45 am
” The complaint in B.L.R. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
The judge held that the defence of statutory acquiescence raised by the Defendants under section 48 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994), could not succeed because the five year period only starts to run when the earlier trade mark owner has knowledge of both the use of the later trade mark, and of its registration (applying Case C-482/09, Budejovický Budvar np v Anheuser-Busch Inc [2011] ECR I-08701). [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:32 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK December 21, 2024 Genesis Technology v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
From Luo v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Part I: Background: Why Amgen v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
I. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:28 am
USCIS and Amin v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Resource Kit is a frequently updated collection of current Practical Guidance materials on generative AI, ChatGPT, and similar tools. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:42 pm
I am skeptical that Arizona v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:27 am
ART v OHIM (C-171/06 P): It is necessary, in any event, to reject T.I.M.E. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am
In Nimkoff v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:20 am
Game Plan, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 4:23 pm
I observed: According to Vice Chancellor "[b]usinesses and their lawyers do that so they can invoke Delaware's contractarian regime and argue that it should override how other jurisdictions regulate restrictive covenants". [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 11:12 am
“I have also considered that Mr. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 1:13 pm
The new case, Genesis B. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
CAAF held in 2023 in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:15 am
P’rs, LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
The Amended Regulation defines the Senior Governing Body as the board of directors (or an appropriate committee thereof) or equivalent governing body or, if neither of those exist, the senior officer or officers of a covered entity responsible for that entity’s cybersecurity program.[35] The Senior Governing Body of the covered entity is required to exercise oversight of the covered entity’s cybersecurity risk management, including by: (i) having su [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 am
See Section 191-d (7)(b)(i) and (v). [read post]
