Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 681 - 700
of 7,526
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Swaps, like other derivatives, are instruments for (re-)allocating risk. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:19 pm
In the wake of Congress’ failure to enact the VALID Act last year, Commissioner Califf and CDRH officials have made public statements affirming the Agency’s intent to take matters into its own hands and initiate LDT rulemaking. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:32 pm
Re-risking in a win-win environment will prove quite interesting to achieve, if that is indeed the point of all of this. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
Time and again, Garland could have made decisions to seek to assure the public with more moderate and transparent decisions. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
But they’re wrong for very different reasons. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
” Decisions this Week United StatesScarborough v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:54 pm
” In re Marriage of Hellwig (1981), 100 Ill. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am
That decision was 5-4. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:20 am
They’re chosen by the shareholders to make significant decisions for the business. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:45 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Perhaps we have reached the stage of dealing with scientific evidence at which errant and aberrant cases should be retracted, and clearly marked as retracted in the official reporters, and in the electronic legal databases. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 4:45 am
The reaction of many citizens vividly shows the costs of years of biased and inconsistent decisions involving Democratic and Republican figures. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:10 pm
There are parties who hope for years that they're not going to be sued: someone else will. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
”[3] The question presented before the Supreme Court is “[w]hether the refusal to register a mark under Section 1052(c) violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:00 pm
In that case, all who believe in impartial justice can hope that the result is not a lopsided trial before a judge and jury leaning unfairly in the defendant’s direction.Smith has what appears to be among the strongest cases ever brought against a public official. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 1:12 pm
The scam relies on the assumption that victims under distress will make quick, irrational decisions. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
” Gillette argues that while the main focus of the analysis – the effect of federal decisions, including judicial decisions – basically works, treating their decision-making as driven by similar forces as Presidential and Congressional policy considerations may not make sense, as they are unlikely to be considering the full set of policy implications, and may instead adopt easier to deploy decision-making heuristics. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:00 am
Appeals process: If you disagree with the IRS’s decision, you have the right to appeal. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:29 pm
Texas, law enforcement officials can’t indiscriminately stop or detain a motorist. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:02 pm
The European Commission says that the law “interferes with the democratic process” by potentially subjecting officials running for re-election to high-profile inquiries and asserts that the law may effectively ban candidates from public office. [read post]
