Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD" Results 681 - 700 of 2,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Similarly, exacerbates tension on First Amendment interests b/c we have a merchandising claim at work—Court’s intuition that he should win does real damage to Rogersby finding the use artistically relevant, but also finding that b/c we’re in the same (merchandising) market, it might be explicitly misleading even though the defendant isn’t doing anything explicitly misleading.Porous markets: Excelled Sheepskin v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Joaquin Castro (D-Tex.) tweeted have at least two things in common: they are all constituents in his district, and moreover, they all donated the maximum amount to President Trump’s campaign this year. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 2:14 am by Goldberg Jones
Oregon Statue 107.137 (1) reads: “In determining the best interests and welfare of the child, the court shall consider the following relevant factors: (a)The emotional ties between the child and other family members; (b)The interest of the parties in and attitude toward the child;(c)The desirability of continuing an existing relationship;(d)The abuse of one parent by the other;(e)The preference for the primary caregiver of… [read post]
” (Art. 49(1)(d)) The European Regulators pointed out that the “public interest” needs to be an interest recognized in E.U. law or Member State law—not a third country. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:59 am by Michael Lowe
  Three of the most common are those involving the loss table (§2B1.1(b)(1)), the victims table (§2B1.1(b)(2)), and the sophisticated means enhancement (§2B1.1(b)(10)). 1. [read post]
The judges’ conclusions on the key issues In order to make good an art 14 claim, a claimant has to establish that (a) the circumstances fall within the ambit of a substantive Convention right, (b) the claimant has a relevant status for the purposes of art 14, (c) they have been treated differently from others in a similar situation, by reason of their status; if so the burden is then on the state to demonstrate (d) whether the difference in treatment is objectively justified.… [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
Defendant called complainant a pig and said she was going to tell complainant's employer, a child-care facility, about "what kind of person work[ed] there. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Russell D. Knight
The court will then make a decision based on the “best interests of the child. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of D (a child), heard 3-4 Oct 2018. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Mandatory/conditional disclosures (if you say A, you must also say B; A means X) require justification, but should not be open season. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The survey expert also analyzed these, and found that 18% indicated that the presence of corn syrup would end or decrease their purchases of MC beers and 4% indicated they’d start or increase purchases. [read post]
28 May 2019, 10:56 am by William Ford
Demonstrated interest in the law desired. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:37 pm
This is set out in section 179: 179 (1) Subject to subsection (2), the Supreme Court on application may appoint one or more persons as trustees over(a)particular property to which the child is entitled, including any property derived from the property or from the disposition of the property, or(b)all property to which the child is entitled at the time the order is made and to which the child becomes entitled while the order is in effect, except… [read post]