Search for: "INFORRM" Results 681 - 700 of 882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am by INFORRM
The Freedom of Information Act has become a powerful tool for journalists and campaigners at both local and national levels seeking to reveal the workings of the state. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
  Perhaps the most interesting feature of this judgment from our point of view is the first reference to Inforrm in a High Court judgment (see [24]). [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 3:11 am by INFORRM
In this context, the Judge confirmed a previously unsettled point of law: suspects in criminal investigations have a prima facie reasonable expectation of privacy (see Professor Callender-Smith’s Inforrm post). [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Dupate v Latvia ([2020] ECHR 819) the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights held that the publication of covertly taken photographs of the partner of a politician leaving hospital with her newborn baby was a violation of her Article 8 rights. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:28 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
(See also the Daily Mail and Guardian reports that James Murdoch was personally involved in authorising deletion of emails about phone hacking here; and here), And an interesting You Gov opinion poll for Impress published at Inforrm website. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Niemela v Google (2015 BCSC 1024) the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed a claim for a worldwide interim libel injunction against Google by a Vancouver lawyer who had been subject to online abuse by someone he alleged to have been a former client and entered summary judgment for Google. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
  Like Hugh Tomlinson’s Inforrm post on the case, Rónán Ó Fathaight is critical of the decision, concluding All in all, the judgment in Hoffer is particularly bereft of reasoning: failing to place the statements in the context of a pamphlet, where hyperbole is to be expected; and failing to place importance on the statement being a value-judgment. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Raghav Mendiratta, Global Freedom of Expression Legal Rearcher, in an article for Inforrm’s Blog observes that civil liberties and free expression have seen a slow but steady breakdown in India over the last few years, culminating in the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (‘the 2021 Rules’). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 10:25 am by INFORRM
Our post was cross-posted elsewhere (e.g. at Inforrm, Index on Censorship and Alastair Campbell) and the links were widely shared, so that despite the silence of most of the press the message reached many thousands of people even in the first 24 hours. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:21 am by Charon QC
  The Panopticon blog does just that with this post and admits to the ‘wheeze’ : THE IDENTITY OF JACK THE RIPPER And since I am a segue kind of a guy…. over to Inforrm’s blog – a very useful port of call on media law  – where they consider this week: News: “Press Regulation” – the Lord Chief Justice steps into the debate and Judgment: Trafigura v Guardian News and Media Former practising barrister Amanda Bancroft… [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Raab expanded considerably on the sentiments expressed above in the first chapter of  his book The Assault on Liberty: What Went Wrong with Rights (2009). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Bild GmbH v Germany [2023] ECHR 851 the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights found that an order that a publisher should cease publication of CCTV footage of an arrest without pixelating the face of one of the officers involved was a violation of Article 10 as it could lead to an unacceptable ban on future publication on matters of public interest. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  In a post on Inforrm Steve Barnett argued that this was a deliberate attempt to undermine the BBC by its political and media enemies. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm by INFORRM
 The CPS press release about this prosecution was the subject of an unsuccessful libel claim (see the Inforrm post about the case). [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am by Melina Padron
Louis Charalambous discusses the issue on the Inforrm’s Blog in light of the Christopher Jefferies contempt of court case. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:46 am by Melina Padron
 The Law and Lawyers blog offers and succinct overview of the issue, with various useful links to the many ramifications of the phone hacking scandal, and the Inforrm blog makes the case for statutory regulation. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
  The arguments that exemplary damages and court ordered apologies are contrary to Article 10 have previously been considered on Inforrm. [read post]