Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 681 - 700
of 889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm
In the case of Dupate v Latvia ([2020] ECHR 819) the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights held that the publication of covertly taken photographs of the partner of a politician leaving hospital with her newborn baby was a violation of her Article 8 rights. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 4:15 pm
The Editor’s Weblog has a piece about the Inforrm/MST event at Gray’s Inn “Libel Reform: in the public’s interest? [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
The Panopticon blog does just that with this post and admits to the ‘wheeze’ : THE IDENTITY OF JACK THE RIPPER And since I am a segue kind of a guy…. over to Inforrm’s blog – a very useful port of call on media law – where they consider this week: News: “Press Regulation” – the Lord Chief Justice steps into the debate and Judgment: Trafigura v Guardian News and Media Former practising barrister Amanda Bancroft… [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm
In the case of Bild GmbH v Germany [2023] ECHR 851 the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights found that an order that a publisher should cease publication of CCTV footage of an arrest without pixelating the face of one of the officers involved was a violation of Article 10 as it could lead to an unacceptable ban on future publication on matters of public interest. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 4:02 pm
Comment Preliminary issue hearings on meaning have become common place (see previous Inforrm posts here and here). [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm
In a post on Inforrm Steve Barnett argued that this was a deliberate attempt to undermine the BBC by its political and media enemies. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:46 am
The Law and Lawyers blog offers and succinct overview of the issue, with various useful links to the many ramifications of the phone hacking scandal, and the Inforrm blog makes the case for statutory regulation. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
If you would like to read a summary of the judgment you can read my previous post for Inforrm here: Myth 1: “This judgment means it’s true Lawrence Fox is a racist” The judgment didn’t decide this. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm
And what a remarkable history it is – from our humble convict days, to the modern success of being crowned the libel capital of the world by academics (Roy Baker’sThird Person Singular, 17/10/2003) and bloggers (Inforrm, 12/10/2010); and, finally, to the enactment of a uniform code which Dr Rolph tells us is “characterised by haste and compromise”. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:09 pm
Raab expanded considerably on the sentiments expressed above in the first chapter of his book The Assault on Liberty: What Went Wrong with Rights (2009). [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 6:33 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a specialist in media and information law at Matrix Chambers and an editor of Inforrm. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
HHJ Luba QC’s County Court judgment in Brown v The Commissioner of Police for Metropolis and another (discussed in a recent Inforrm post) lends further support to this view. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 12:57 am
We thought that for the Inforrm Jubilee celebration we would take the opportunity to remind our readers of some interesting privacy law cases featuring the royal family. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:34 pm
Geoffrey Rush would have zero chance of securing a successful libel verdict if he sued in the United States over the “inappropriate behaviour” story. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am
Louis Charalambous discusses the issue on the Inforrm’s Blog in light of the Christopher Jefferies contempt of court case. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm
As argued this week by Brian Cathart for Inforrm, the closing days of the campaign demonstrated editors’ flagrant disregard for the Editor’s Code, which requires that the press “distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact”. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am
Judith Townend wrote an insightful post on the incident for the Inforrm’s Blog, which contained opinions from media lawyers and experts, and also links to many of the articles featured in newspapers and law blogs alike. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, an offer of amends defence fails, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Inforrm’s Blog. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:27 pm
Arguments relating to the concept of public domain and, in particular, analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision in PJS v News Group Newspapers [2016] UKSC 26, and privacy law generally, have been expertly dealt with in two previous Inforrm posts from the Brett Wilson Media Law Blog and Rebecca Moosavian. [read post]
