Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 681 - 700
of 950
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2011, 5:02 pm
We would like to draw readers’ attention to the recent updates to our “Forthcoming Cases” table. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm
On the second “What areas would you like to see covered on Inforrm? [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 pm
The recent decision in Adelson v Anderson [2011] EWHC 2497 (QB) (Inforrm comment here) showed that such an application can be effective where the reputational interests at stake are modified by the time taken to pursue the claim. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:06 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Crookes v Newton 2011 SCC 47, written up here for Inforrm by Paul Schabas and Jon Goheen, has been hailed as a victory for free speech online. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am
The Inforrm’s blog posted this piece about the highlights of the speech. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm
We published an Inforrm report here. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 6:21 am
In the first ten months of 2011, we have had nearly 450 posts on Inforrm on the usual range of topics – privacy, libel, media regulation and international. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
As the Inforrm blog noted yesterday, the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, has joined the debate about press reform with a speech warning of the risk of throwing the baby of freedom of expression out with the bathwater of cruel and unfair journalism. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
The Panopticon blog does just that with this post and admits to the ‘wheeze’ : THE IDENTITY OF JACK THE RIPPER And since I am a segue kind of a guy…. over to Inforrm’s blog – a very useful port of call on media law – where they consider this week: News: “Press Regulation” – the Lord Chief Justice steps into the debate and Judgment: Trafigura v Guardian News and Media Former practising barrister Amanda Bancroft… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
See the Inforrm’s Blog’s commentary to the decision here. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
This post by Lorna Skinner originally appeared on Inforrm’s Blog and is reproduced here with permission and thanks. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am
The police may well be justified in seeking the disclosure, on the grounds that they need to plug the holes (see Brian Cathcart on Inforrm’s Blog for a post from their perspective). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:22 am
The police may well be justified in seeking the disclosure, on the grounds that they need to plug the holes (see Brian Cathcart on Inforrm’s Blog for a post from their perspective). [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am
For those who remain curious about the latest developments in the phone hacking saga, why not check out the Inforrm’s Blog latest updates? [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 5:04 pm
In May 2011 at the height of “super-injunction spring” the Government announced the establishment of a Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:22 am
Inforrm’s Blog describes the Press’ treatment of Leighton as the ‘“monstering” of the innocent’ and suggests that criminal suspects should be afforded anonymity. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:14 am
This post first appeared on Inforrm’s Blog, and is reproduced here with permission and thanks Filed under: Art. 10 | Freedom of Expression, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Case summaries, Freedom of Information, In the news, Police [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:28 pm
There is a newer post by the Inforrm’s Blog, and a very thorough post in the Ministry of Truth Blog. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 1:39 pm
| Pink Tape; Inforrm; News: Hemming MP’s “super injunction victim” named as sex abuse fabricator « Inforrm’s Blog, and the Fighting Monsters blog: Hemming and Haigh – The Journey of an Injunction. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 2:21 am
| Pink Tape; Inforrm; News: Hemming MP’s “super injunction victim” named as sex abuse fabricator « Inforrm’s Blog, and the Fighting Monsters blog: Hemming and Haigh – The Journey of an Injunction. [read post]
