Search for: "In Interest of Ep"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2007, 10:00 am
The IPKat doesn't usually comment on individual UK-IPO Opinions under section 74A, but this one caught his eye and he thought some of his readers might be interested.In Opinion 01/07, a request was made regarding the validity of EP(UK) patent 0852363, in particular whether certain claims in the patent were novel and inventive in the light of various submitted documents. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:20 am
If the EP decides to vote against the JURI mandate, every MEP will be able to file an amendment to the JURI report in the next plenary session in September. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:25 am
If the EP decides to vote against the JURI mandate, every MEP will be able to file an amendment to the JURI report in the next plenary session in September. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 4:12 am
It will be interesting to see what the Higher Regional Court will decide on these counts on appeal. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 7:44 am
The information Greenfield transmitted to EP, in the form of PowerPoint slides as part of a presentation “deck,” was under explicit confidentiality provisions. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 11:21 am
A Unitary Patent (UP) differs from the current European Patent (EP) system as it will have unitary effect for all countries of the EU (with the exception of Spain and Croatia). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:08 pm
[…] The appellant refers to the proceedings concerning another EP application where it proceeded in the very same way. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:07 am
What would be really interesting, interjects Merpel, is if the EPO Boards of Appeal uphold the patent in a different form from that just upheld by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
S 8 Ep 6. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 10:05 pm
If you are interested in seeing other JLE videos (not related to the iPhone), check out the funny videos "Short Film" starring Elerick and Roth, "Mime Time Ep. 1," and a humorous City of Cleveland reaction to the LeBron decision from a few months ago. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:54 am
The grant proceedings having been terminated by the revision decision on 12 June 2006 were still pending up to this date of the revision decision. [24] As the present divisional application was filed […] before the revision decision was taken by the ED in the parent application, the parent application was pending at the filing date of the divisional application. [25] This decision is well worth reading because it deals with an incredibly complicated… [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
The IPKat wonders if the requester has the nerve to try yet again, and would be interested to see what result they get on their third attempt. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:30 am
The difficulty is nicely brought out in the account of a robing room conversation with a fellow advocate which Pliny recounts in a letter (Ep I, xx, 14). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:03 am
One interesting point of law is noteworthy, in relation to the issue of whether the patent makes a technical contribution (relevant to inventive step and insufficiency). [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:50 am
Bennett’s Conditional PRU Award (as defined in the PRU Agreement) shall not be less than 80,000 PRUs regardless of the Company’s actual non-GAAP EPS achievement for fiscal 2013. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:10 am
The attendee firms was a who's who of the settlement profession with EPS, Ringler, JMW, Brant Hickey, Millennium, Summit, SPI, James Street and others represented. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:38 pm
One interesting point of law is noteworthy, in relation to the issue of whether the patent makes a technical contribution (relevant to inventive step and insufficiency). [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
Chantal writes to inform him as follows: "The almost endless series of olanzapine cases (inter alia Eli Lilly patent EP 0 454 436) has now produced an interesting sequel in the Netherlands. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
At international conferences, the Commission shall, in view of Parliament's extended powers under the Lisbon Treaty, at Parliament's request, act as facilitator in order to enable the chair of the EP delegation to be granted observer status in relevant meetings and guarantee access to EU facilities for Parliament's delegations. [read post]
