Search for: "In Re Crawford" Results 681 - 700 of 904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2020, 8:58 am by Michael B. Stack
Returning someone to a position based on incorrect information can be a recipe for re-injury. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:55 pm
 Council member Lee Allison Crawford reported that her colleagues at her table felt the church was “just beginning to understand the system we inherited from General Convention 2009 with the last round of cuts. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:08 am
Massachusetts, in which the Court held that laboratory reports were “testimonial” within the meaning of Crawford v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 11:02 am by Mandelman
  Dubya has got to be laughing his ass off in Crawford, don’t you think? [read post]
They’re Pulled in Too Many Directions Within a corporation, everyone has a boss. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:24 am by Kali Borkoski
The South Carolina voter ID case provides a much stronger argument given Marion v Crawford County rejecting the bulk of Holder’s arguments. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  (They are hard to find in decisions like Crawford v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 7:58 am by Andrew Delaney
He pens a dissent, joined by Justice Crawford, scolding the majority for “finding ambiguity where none exists. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:21 pm by Andrew Delaney
The standard of review we’re dealing with is abuse of discretion. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
BVBA, a decision where the General Court of the European Union addressed the issue of whether and to what extent OHIM is bound to comply with earlier res judicata decisions of national Courts.* Litigation with friends: a Scramble for Scrabble in the Court of AppealFormer guest Kat Darren Meale is back to treat us to his account of JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 290 [on which see the earlier Katpost here], where Mattel… [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But as long as we’re asking what “the Framers [did and] did not want,” let’s look at the odd drafting history of the Presidential Selection clauses and at the final approved language. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 11:32 pm by Administrator
The alleged apprehension of unfairness must be assessed in the context of the entire proceeding, through the eyes of a reasonable and informed observer: RDS at paras 31, 36, 40, 48, 91, 111; R v Schmaltz, 2015 ABCA 4 at para 19, 21–23; R v Crawford, 2015 ABCA 175 at paras 7–17; R v Colling, 2017 ABCA 286 at paras 19–21, 30, 34–39, 61, aff’d 2018 SCC 23; R v Teed, 2020 ABCA… [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am by Girardeau Spann
” Logically, this under­standing of racial focus could even jeopardize the elusive “mere repeal” rule that the Court found to be outside the scope of the political structure doctrine in Crawford v. [read post]