Search for: "In Re Katz" Results 681 - 700 of 1,321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 10:45 am by Alfred Brophy
 The general editors have been a distinguished group, from Paul Freund to Stanley Katz, to now Maeva Marcus. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 6:33 am by Ken Lopez
Each includes just a hint of advocacy.The patent tutorial presentation below was presented on DVD in the In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation MDL. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:54 am by emp
Now I admit we’re way down in the legal weeds here but I read the Scalia decision – with 5 justices supporting it — as requiring a combination of Arguments 1 and 2 plus a property/trespass violation. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:00 am by Simon Lewis
But just when we think that you only need to add IT to law, along comes Prof Dan Katz who says that there is much more to it. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 6:52 am by Jordan Furlong
This envelope is really getting pushed, however, at Michigan State University Law School, where professors Daniel Katz and Renee Knake are engaged in some of the most avant-garde work in legal education I’ve seen in a while. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:18 pm by Paul Maharg
  Indeed pretty much every industry is affected by the digital revolution we’re living through. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:56 am by Chris Dreyer
The New Law Business Model by Ali Katz Ali Katz makes the argument that too many lawyers are going about building their practice the wrong way. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:54 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
” An activity is a search and thus triggers the Fourth Amendment if it infringes on a reasonable expectation of privacy (the Katz test) or it involves a government trespass (the Jones test). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Howard Knopf
I acted for David Lametti, as he then was, and Ariel Katz in the SODRAC case, and made complementary submissions to Ariel Katz in the York case. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:39 am by Priscilla Smith
  Just because in 1967 Katz said that the Fourth Amendment protects more than physical trespass, doesn’t mean that the Fourth Amendment doesn’t protect physical trespass. [read post]