Search for: "In re: D.C" Results 681 - 700 of 8,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2022, 12:47 am by Jack Bogdanski
At least Merkley and Blumenauer nominally reside in Portland, although they're in Washington, D.C. most of the time, and on many days Blumie seems to be on some other planet. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by Sarah Moses and Spencer Persson
On March 8, 2018, the Ninth Circuit issued its highly anticipated decision in In re Zappos.com, Inc., finding that allegations of future risk of identity theft from a data breach are sufficient to confer standing. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 10:38 am
The government wants the D.C. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 11:06 pm by Marta Requejo
For another twist of American courts on the Alien Tort Statute (this time, in favour of its applicability to corporations), I suggest reading the D.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In June 1972, five men associated both with the CIA and with the Committee for the Re-Election of the President (i.e., President Richard Nixon) broke into the Democratic National Committee’s offices in the Watergate Complex in Washington, D.C. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:21 am
They're not protesting the D.C. law against crowding, obstructing, and incommoding by engaging in crowding, obstructing, and incommoding. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 1:07 pm
In a recent post about those gargantuan Supreme Court clerkship bonuses, we mentioned Kellogg Huber, the super-elite D.C. litigation boutique. [read post]
9 May 2018, 5:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
”Forty percent of commuters love driving and being in their car, which was echoed by commuters in Chicago (40 percent) and Houston (40 percent) who claim they’re content. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:18 am
  He discussed the private interest factors and noted that both the parties and the identified witnesses were scattered from California to Washington D.C., unlike VW II (and, incidentally, In re TS Tech, which came out six days after this opinion) but noted that the bulk of the parties' dispute dealt with the public factors due to the existence of the prior litigation. [read post]