Search for: "In re: PROCEEDINGS REGARDING CONDUCT OF COUNSEL"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
CGSB’s secretary to the Committee raced through and corrupted the required procedures without regard to their negative effect upon the quality of the draft standard. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:23 am
U.S., 383 U.S. 541 (1966) (While courts are given discretion regarding transfer proceedings, this does not “confer upon the Juvenile Court a license for arbitrary procedure. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:34 pm
The Court of Appeal for Ontario agreed with counsel for the defence and did exactly that. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm
Some other important processing points: attorney-client communications must comply with any guidance promulgated by the Assistant Attorney General for National Security, and an IC element receiving raw SIGINT may conduct communications metadata analysis, including contact chaining, without regard to the communicants' location or nationality (though again, only for valid foreign intelligence or counterintelligence purposes). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
For example, in In re Morgan, Pryor wrote an opinion holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:07 am
Further, "[u]nless the parties agree otherwise, all matters, including the conduct and demeanor of the parties and their counsel during the settlement process, are confidential and may never be disclosed to anyone, including the appointing court. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:07 am
Further, "[u]nless the parties agree otherwise, all matters, including the conduct and demeanor of the parties and their counsel during the settlement process, are confidential and may never be disclosed to anyone, including the appointing court. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
But the Court of Appeal were also surprisingly dismissive of arguments made in Q v Q : Re B : Re C (Private Law : Public Funding) [2015] 1 FLR 324 and other cases that a fair trial would be compromised without legal representation of an accused – they thought that q [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
The court stayed the defendant’s requested re-examination proceeding until a final judgment of the Federal Court[4]. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 10:02 pm
Fallout The court remanded the case to Judge Goldberg, and he conducted a conference with counsel on December 7, 2016. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:33 am
The government says you’re never right. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
And, again, that's all you're going to be allowed to hear until a jury is picked. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
We’re not able to discuss them all, but we have a few minutes in our busy schedules to survey some of the contenders. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:14 am
’ (In re E.O. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:53 am
The early morning session ends when Rushforth requests a brief recess to confer with his co-counsel regarding their questions and if there were any grounds for a challenge. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
In this regard, for re [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 7:18 am
Dismissal here, the relators maintain, would protect State Farm from the consequences of its conduct based solely on a fortuitous mistake by the relators’ counsel. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:03 am
Board of Regents of the Univ. of Houston Sys. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:12 am
” MJ [COL POHL]: Take him out of the proceedings. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:47 pm
Counsel should be consulted regarding any such arrangements—particularly since violating RESPA can bring criminal penalties. [read post]
