Search for: "In re Long" Results 681 - 700 of 77,186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Ruth Carter
Tell them it’s ok if they make mistakes, as long as they’re trying, and they correct themselves when it happens. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:31 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
Delnorth Pty Ltd [2011] APO 55 (27 July 2011) Re-examination – initiated by Commissioner following withdrawal of opponent – whether prior art documents would have been ascertained, understood and regarded as relevant by a person skilled in the art – whether claims involve an inventive step – partial revocation of patent In what may be the final chapter in a long-running saga – which has, incidentally, provided essential guidance regarding the… [read post]
24 May 2022, 12:47 am by Michael Ehline
If you’re having trouble settling, contact Ehline Law and our personal injury lawyers for a free consultation. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by Kyle Krull
For example, in 2011, if you're 41 to 50, it's $640 a year; if you’re 51 to 60 it's $1,270; if you're 61-70 it's $3,390; and if you're 71 and older, it's $4,240. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 8:56 am
The piece notes that JP Morgan and Cheniere may take advantage of Sabine Pass' large storage and LNG re-export capabilities. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:33 pm
 Sure, I could see a Scalia or a Thomas writing the thing -- as long as you added lots of additional insults and vitriol. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
This trend’s beginnings arose from the 2017 Delaware Supreme Court decision in In re Investors Bancorp, Inc. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 1:47 pm
We're glad it's done and signed and we have a program. [read post]