Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 681 - 700
of 29,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2011, 3:00 pm
SO I GOT A MESSAGE ANNOUNCING markdowns on the new Apple Macbook Pros, and, well, technically they’re marked down, but come on . . . . [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:42 am
A few things to look out for if you're considering taking an in-house job, according to Biglaw partner turned senior in-house lawyer Mark Herrmann. [read post]
WELL, THE OLD CARS LAST A LOT LONGER THAN THEY USED TO, AND THEY’RE BETTER THAN THEY USED TO BE: Qu…
26 Jul 2011, 11:27 am
WELL, THE OLD CARS LAST A LOT LONGER THAN THEY USED TO, AND THEY’RE BETTER THAN THEY USED TO BE: Question: How much pent-up demand is there for new cars? [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 8:45 am
Anyone previously immunized for Hepatitis A by their physician or through clinics recently held by the Seneca County Health Department DO NOT need to be re-immunized. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:26 pm
If you’re new to TypeIt4Me, this makes a good starting point. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:00 am
One of my favorite insurance blogs is blog-re, written by Mark Geoghegen. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:03 am
Earlier this month, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) affirmed a likelihood of confusion refusal under Trademark Act Section 2(d) in the case of In re Plastic-Plus Awards . [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of GODDESSES HERA for gaming machines, slot machines, and the like, in view of the registered mark HERA’S GOLD for computer game software and gaming].In re Peag, LLC, Serial No. 86019875 (Se, 2016) [not precedential]. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:13 am
[Refusal to register the mark 1-800-TIRE-911 for vehicle tire repair services and roadside assistance services, on the ground that the mark fails to function as a service mark: i.e., the mark is merely informational and would not be seen as an indicator of source but merely as the means by which customers can contact Applicant].In re Paul Adam’s Trademarks and Patents LLC, Serial No. 85851688 (September 11, 2015) [not precedential]. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:57 pm
” In re Haase at *8 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
Mark I. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:06 am
Thus, all that the respondents had to do was to re-calculate the marks in terms of the amended rules for the examination in question and apply the same to the petitioner. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm
If you’re looking for more background on the case, you should see the first post of this series. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
In re Don Calder, Serial No. 85143799 (January 29, 2015) [not precedential].The Board found that the design element is dominant in the cited mark, since it is much larger than the words REPUBLIK OF KALIFORNIA and is "by far the most visually significant element of the mark. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 5:05 am
See Viterra, 101 USPQ2d at 1912; In re Energy Telecomms. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:50 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Lin, Serial No. 86329057 (August 20, 2015) [not precedential] [Refusal to register the mark shown immediately below in view of the registered mark PH:FIVE, for overlapping clothing items]. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:40 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of MAXGAIN for "natural supplements for male enhancement" in light of the registered mark MAXIMUM GAIN for food, herbal, and other supplements].In re Shackleton S.A., Serial No. 85450227 (October 15, 2013) [not precedential]. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 11:10 pm
[Refusal to register GINGER-EZE for dietary supplements containing ginger, in view of the registered mark GINEASE for dietary and nutritional supplements].In re Les Mills International Limited, Serial No. 85652407 (August 7, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 3:05 am
[Refusal of the mark LEON HUGHES’ COASTERS for "Live performances by a musical group," in view of the registered mark THE COASTERS for "entertainment services in the nature of a musical group"].In re Korn Ferry Leadership Consulting Corporation, Serial No. 85932617 (July 6, 2015) [not precedential]. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:14 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown below for various clothing items, in view of the registered mark MADE IN HEAVEN for overlapping clothing items].In re Illinois Tool Works Inc., Serial No. 86391742 (February 23, 2017) [not precedential]. [read post]
