Search for: "In re TM"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,029
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2014, 12:03 pm
Patent lawyers are stereotyped as more conservative/nerdy, but they’re kicking our ass in legislative reform. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:03 am
They’re just different aspects. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 4:40 am
They need clear rights to host reviews and offer a taxonomy even though they're commercial entities, otherwise TM owners will cherry-pick and get rid of negative reviews. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:54 am
If you rely on internal limits, that won’t work—the right is vague and also you’re focusing on the wrong person. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:42 am
” Defendants’ website does say that “SmartBuyGlasses is not affiliated with nor an official re-seller for Maui Jim .... [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am
Does interference w/TM interests matter any more than other deception? [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 9:14 am
RT: you get some weird results that are path-dependent: TM and © vicarious liability differ, but why? [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:07 pm
The TM examiners used to ignore that. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 7:03 am
“Intellectual property rights aren’t free: They’re imposed at the expense of future creators and of the public at large,” and the Rogerstest applies when this expense is most significant.However, Rogersexplicitly incorporates an exception for “misleading titles that are confusingly similar to other titles. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am
A: in some settings we don’t care: we’re trying to evaluate a market solution. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm
Peggy Radin: Rhetorical capture—the word cybersquatting was invented; took an asset that was unknown and allocated it to TM owners as soon as it was “born. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am
In some districts, this covers TM. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 11:18 pm
Not that hippies are offensive, mind you; they’re my tribe. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 10:19 am
When you’re six, they fix everything.) [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:37 pm
And how do I put that little TM thingie in? [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 5:16 pm
We're almost colleagues! [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 4:46 am
Well, as is probably obvious from my tone, we’re fortunate enough that the modern chess board was laid out long before copyright statutes were but a twinkle in the eye of the legislator. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:40 am
If you think the legal fees for a bankruptcy went up after the 2005 amendments, you're right. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 11:39 am
The decision here is somewhat surprising to me because we’re talking about a Constitutional question. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:20 am
You can even use the little "TM" or "SM" next to your logo without having filed a formal registration with the USPTO. [read post]
