Search for: "In re a Grand Jury Investigation" Results 681 - 700 of 1,460
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2015, 7:38 am by Ken White
Some have argued that the Department of Justice must have had information spurring them to use the grand jury to pierce the anonymity of people engaged in protected political speech. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 4:38 am by SHG
Velamoor then suggested that Reason was “coming close” to interfering with the grand jury investigation. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:00 pm by Joe Mullin
The hunt for commenters was revealed yesterday, when the legal blog Popehat published a grand jury subpoena (PDF) that DOJ investigators gave to Reason. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 11:57 am
  The Third Circuit also determined that, as a grand jury traditionally possesses broad investigatory powers, a grand jury subpoena is valid if it merely identifies materials which could reasonably contain information that is relevant to the government’s investigation. [read post]
29 May 2015, 12:49 pm
” The raids were accompanied by grand jury subpoenas, at which activists refused to testify. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:23 am by Ken White
They had already put witnesses before the grand jury, they had already used grand jury subpoenas to get Hastert's bank records, they already knew exactly how they would charge and prove up the structuring charge. [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:35 am
As drafted and passed by Congress, Section 215 is just a grand jury subpoena authority: In adopting § 215, Congress intended to give the government, on the approval of the FISC, broad‐ ranging investigative powers analogous to those traditionally used in connection with grand jury investigations into possible criminal behavior. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:07 pm by Rahul Bhagnari
Moreover, many of the legitimate things the government can do with Section 215 can be accomplished in other ways—with grand jury subpoenas or with pen registers, for example. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:28 am by SHG
  Now that Thompson has decided not to present the case to the grand jury, that decision might appear less controversial. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 12:36 pm
Here, in its entirety, is the basis for the charge of obstruction of justice:  Before the grand jury, Bonds testified as follows: Q: Did Greg[, your trainer,] ever give you anything that required a syringe to inject yourself with? [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The conviction was based on the italicized portion of a statement (by Bonds) made in response to a question (by a federal prosecutor) during an investigative grand jury proceeding regarding a steroid ring with which Bonds was allegedly involved: Q. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:00 pm
The statement says absolutely nothing pertinent to the subject of the grand jury’s investigation. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 10:54 am by Jon
Grand jury testimony is usually secret, and any grand juror can be prosecuted for disclosing grand jury testimony. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 12:14 pm by Jason Weiner
They might ensue as you make a deposition, testify under oath or appear before a grand jury. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:30 pm by Carrie Cordero
If this type of special advocate were created by legislation, here is just a snapshot of what it would mean: We would be providing greater ability to challenge surveillance to foreign intelligence targets, than to subjects of criminal investigation domestically, for whom wiretap applications are approved in camera ex parte by district court judges and magistrates. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
" A grand jury is expected to be convened soon to decide whether to proceed with formal charges against Leak and Nature’s Reflections. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 4:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Whether a witness may be examined by leading questions in the grand jury is within the discretion of the district attorney as the law advisor to the grand jury. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:25 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Harold Dutton filed a bill to transform grand juries into full-time, permanent "probable cause juries. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 4:48 am by Donald Barbati
  “If they’re going to have to face some sort of grand jury on the state level, I really wonder how efficient this would be or how more effective it would be. [read post]