Search for: "International Paper Co. v. United States"
Results 681 - 700
of 804
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
To achieve that goal, vested interests want to harmonize international standards. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
The Chicago paper builds on the arguments she made in two earlier papers on the Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in R.A.V. v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:40 am
H-09-0352 (United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Among them is the Kalamazoo River, which was tainted for decades with industrial waste from paper mills and other manufacturing plants. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
’ not descriptive as a matter of law: Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
As a common law principle, the banking sector has long functioned under the value of confidentiality, largely embodied in the famous 1924 United Kingdom decision, Tournier v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:39 pm
In United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again:… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit) United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
At this point, there is the initial AQ7 ad, then a group response letter drafted by Ben Wittes of the Brookings Institution and my co-task force member at the Hoover Task Force on National Security and Law, which I also signed. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
The Court need not examine the sufficiency of the supporting evidence in plaintiff's opposition papers. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:35 pm
Other courts have applied the common-law agency test set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965) McKeiver v. [read post]
