Search for: "JUDGE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,586
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 11:08 am
The amendment would authorize prolonged detention even of people who have won their cases before an immigration judge based upon factors such as hardship to U.S. citizen children, long residence in the United States, domestic violence, or fear of torture or persecution, and who are defending against government appeals, including many individuals who will ultimately win the right to remain lawfully in the United States on these grounds. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
It was, in fact, the exercise of arbitrary power that lead the thirteen original colonies — which would later become the first thirteen states of the United States of America — to declare war on Great Britain. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
Holbrook v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
Holbrook v. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 2:23 pm
Ajinomoto Co., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
He argues that Clinton v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:27 pm
In Zeltser, et. al v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:31 pm
The new law no longer requires an invalidating sale to be in the United States – now it can be anywhere. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
Yet, over a century later, Justice Scalia in Arizona v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Mitchell’s lead argument, to which he devoted far more pages in his briefs than any other, was that although Donald Trump served as “the President of the United States of America,” Art. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
Cayetano and Hawai'i v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:19 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm
In the district court, Judge John D. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 10:34 pm
This principle most often arises in church property disputes, where the Supreme Court has held that courts may not decide which faction in a church is the more religiously orthodox, but it also applies more broadly to prohibit the government from adjudicating people’s rights based on theological judgments (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 7:03 am
United States of America, issued on March 30. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
We focus first on the landmark 1813 case Queen v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services et al., in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (No.1:16-cv-00878). [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 8:08 pm
As we previously reported, the fate of the DACA program now rests in Judge Hanen’s hands, who is currently presiding over a lawsuit filed by the State of Texas along with seven other states (State of Texas, et al., v. the United States of America, et al.). [read post]
