Search for: "John Deering" Results 681 - 700 of 797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2009, 8:11 pm
They said the contract was for the Le Baron and a 1976 John Deere Model 450 Tractor for an additional $50,000; that part of the sum was for the Le Baron, and part for the tractor; and that the agreement was that the vehicles wouldn't be delivered until payment had been received in full for both. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:35 am by Eric Goldman
A reasonable internet user might assume that JohnDeere.com will likely lead to John Deere’s website, but that same user is much less likely to assume that woosterfloral.com will lead to a particular flower shop. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 11:57 am by Bill Marler
  The law firm has brought E. coli lawsuits against such companies as Jack in the Box, Dole, ConAgra, Cargill, and Jimmy John’s. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 7:55 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966). [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:44 pm by Eric Guttag
”  Citing the 2003 Federal Circuit decision of Deering Precision Instruments, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm by Stephen Halbrook
  The relatively low-powered .223 is not even allowed for deer hunting in Delaware and a number of other states. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 3:07 am
"I like looking out in the morning and seeing all the deer," he said. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:45 am by Dennis Crouch
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966) and supplemented in KSR. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:26 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966). [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 2:53 am by Bill Perry
Not steel, but against farm goods, Harley-Davidson motorcycles, Cummins engines, John Deere tractors, and much more. *    *    *    * Then there’s the diplomatic damage, made worse by Mr. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 4:50 pm
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 U.S. 1 (1966)) regarding the obviousness of patents "based on the combination of elements found in the prior art" where there the combination "does no more than yield predictable results. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:42 pm
If, however, consumers expect their farm equipment to be green or their strawberry flavored ice cream to be pink, then those colors serve non-source-related functions, and they do so even if consumers also associate the colors with John Deere and Dippin’ Dots, respectively... [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:45 am by Jason Rantanen
John Deere, 386 U.S. 1, 6 (1966), that Congress may not remove inventions that have entered the public domain by granting patents on them – which the Supreme Court subsequently rejected in the copyright context as a constitutional limitation on legislative power in Golan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:31 am by Dan Harris
Agricultural equipment manufacturer John Deere has seen “work in process” inventory increase to $1.6 billion from $967 million one year ago, largely because they cannot obtain critical components. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:13 pm
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966)). [read post]
22 May 2009, 8:36 am
" USCAP members include: Alcoa - Boston Scientific - BP America - Caterpillar - Chrysler - ConocoPhillips - Dow - Duke Energy - DuPont - Environmental Defense Fund - Exelon - Ford - FPL Group - GE - GM - John Deere - Johnson & Johnson - Natural Resources Defense Council - The Nature Conservancy - NRG Energy - PepsiCo - Pew Center on Global Climate Change - PG&E - PNM Resources - Rio Tinto - Shell - Siemens - World Resources Institute - Xerox. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:51 am
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 U.S. 1 (1966)) regarding the obviousness of patents "based on the combination of elements found in the prior art" where there the combination "does no more than yield predictable results. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
IPSC – Trademark Law I Moderator: Mark McKenna  Trademark Depletion in a Global, Multilingual Economy: Evidence from the European Union (abstract) Jeanne Fromer and Barton Beebe, NYU School of Law  Notes on the EU system: runs in parallel with national systems. [read post]