Search for: "John Doe 28" Results 681 - 700 of 3,458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 11:47 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Toilets picture by psd, pre-fab housing picture from John M [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Milad Emamian
Quinney College of Law’s John Ruple’s argument that the President does not have the authority to reduce a national monument after it is created without congressional approval. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
Busch's claim was filed in the district court on May 11, 2007 and at that time Horton was identified as "John Doe I. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 4:45 am
  While these goals are laudable, the FAA does not offer much in terms of specific programs to reach the goals. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:32 am by John L. Welch
" In re Hershey Chocolate and Confectionary Corporation, Serial No. 77809223 (June 28, 2012) [not precedential].Functionality The applied-for design was narrowly defined by Hershey: "twelve (12) equally-sized recessed panels arranged in a four panel by three panel format with each panel having its own raised border within a large rectangle. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by John L. Welch
In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate (January 28, 2011) [precedential]. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 9:47 pm
Where Clarence Darrow was born (in Kinsman) and John Brown grew to manhood (in Hudson)? [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:50 am by Samuel Bray
The Act provides that a court may declare the rights or other legal relations of parties. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 2:23 am by Jon L. Gelman
” WHAT: Full Committee Hearing on “No Worker Left Behind: Supporting Essential Workers”WHEN: 12:00 PM ET on Wednesday, June 10, 2020 WHO: John A. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 3:34 am
It rejected three product configuration marks due to functionality under Section 2(e)(5), continued to downplay the rareness factor in Section 2(e)(4) surname refusals, and dealt with two phantom mark refusals, affirming one and reversing one.Section 2(a) - Deceptiveness:Precedential No. 8: TTAB Finds KLEER ADHESIVES Deceptive, But Not KLEER MOULDINGS and KLEER TRIMBOARDSection 2(b) - Flag, Coat of Arms, or Other Insignia:Precedential No. 7: TTAB Affirms Section 2(b) Refusal of Mark Simulating the… [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm by Victoria Kwan
Video of the event is available online (the Chief Justice’s interview begins at the 1:29:28 mark). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In a June 28, 2010 decision (here), the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]