Search for: "Jump v State" Results 681 - 700 of 3,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2013, 6:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals rules for the State, finding that the defendants have qualified immunity.The case is Doe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:38 am by Erin Miller
The full texts of the four opinions, and the briefs in the granted cases, appear after the jump. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by John Hopkins
A recent article in e-discovery Law Review about the case of the United States v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:30 am by Russ Bensing
  Oral argument in another case last week, State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
The petitions of the week are below the jump: City of Flint, Michigan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
But state legislatures from both major political parties are jumping on bills to ban powdered alcohol, mostly on the argument that the new product will increase underage drinking. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:36 am by Ben Rubin
  United States v. 300 Units of Rentable Housing, Case No. 09-35990 (9th Cir. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:09 am
 Jumping to the front of the line is called front running, and yes, it's a felony. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am by Kevin Russell
Some great comments from yesterday are below the jump. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
S170577: I attended the oral argument today at the California Supreme Court for Sullivan v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 5:21 pm
A number if issues raised in the Complaint in the matter of " The People of the State of New York by ELIOT SPITZER Attorney General of The State of New York v Coventry First, LLC et al. should be sending chills down the backs of "structured settlement factoring vig takers". [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:07 am by Joey Fishkin
United States, courts reasoned that large company-wide statistical disparities had to come from somewhere. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:36 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
  It is easy to see how the Court could jump to the big constitutional questions in Florida v. [read post]