Search for: "KERR v. STATE"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
Despite some evidence relating to some conventions, there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a widespread and consistent state practice. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:07 am
Real lawyers can have a real impact on the state of the law. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am
The structure of s 117B(6) is straightforward because it unambiguously states that there is no public interest in removal where a person has a genuine and subsisting parental relationship with a qualifying child and it would not be reasonable to expect the child to leave the UK. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:23 am
” Gun rights groups have filed an amicus brief in support of the federal government’s petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:11 am
United States, and its two Eighth Amendment juvenile life-without-parole cases, Miller v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 4:26 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr discusses a good ruling out of the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
Karo and United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:33 am
Thats' just what happened in Weeks v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm
Sotomayor joined one and indicated strongly that she would likely favor the other, but she didn’t need to reach that; doing would have required a United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 2:35 am
Tsetsaut Skii km Lax Ha Chief Darlene Simpson expressed concerns about the environmental impacts of the project to local news, stating: When Seabridge is done with the mine, they get to go home. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 10:28 pm
The court relied upon Sibley State Bank v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
(i) Stanford International Bank Limited (acting by its joint liquidators) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent); and (ii) Stanford International Bank (acting by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant) (Oral Hearing) Earlier this year, the Supreme Court heard a complex dispute arising from the collapse of Stanford International Bank (“SIB”) in early 2009. [read post]
Case o' The Week: Bad Cops Make Good Law, Quon -- Fourth Amendment Privacy Interests in Text Content
22 Jun 2008, 3:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:11 am
There is an interesting case going on in the Ninth, United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2025, 2:53 am
The Judge acknowledged that there was a time when allegations of homosexuality were regarded as defamatory (for example, in Kerr v Kennedy [1942] 1 KB 409, it was determined that describing a woman as a lesbian was defamatory). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
United States is, without a doubt, a “defense win. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:13 am
Lord Toulson, Lord Kerr and Lord Neuberger in the majority stated that Hamblen J had reached an entirely proper conclusion that the role played by the appellant, based mainly on its fundraising relating to a small sum solicited by the Sea Shepherd Conversation Society (SSCS), had been of minimal importance. [read post]
