Search for: "KEY v. WISE" Results 681 - 700 of 710
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Porsche AG: (Class 46), WIPO: Yell Limited v Yell.travel: domain name yell.travel to be transferred to Yell Limited: (Class 46), Some see rise in non-traditional trade marks; national registries not yet: (Intellectual Property Watch)   Global - Patents Lower patentability standards – strategic responses: (IP Thinktank), IP Business Congress sees Finnish inventor become a millionaire: (IAM), Ron Slusky: Five prescriptions for effectively analysing an invention and then… [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Here are some links relevant to this Viacom v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 12:00 am
The states may soon have blanketed a large part of the nation with regional and state climate initiatives that will be so pervasive that they will set the bar for the key components of over-arching federal legislation – and preserve a major role for state and local governments. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
" For the full text of the Court's ruling, see: Juman v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
In this case, the trial judge had to bear in mind that he had already increased the damages for wrongful dismissal in accordance with Wallace v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 5:00 pm
In a 122 page opus on ERISA law (download here), District Court Judge Mark Kravitz has issued a fascinating and thorough decision, Amara v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 7:56 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in R. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
Ferguson and who similarly ignored the wise corresponding dissent of that same Justice Harlan.Epstein writes about the PRA and the new damage rule:"The key damage provision states "The court shall conduct an analysis to ensure that a reasonable royalty . . . is applied only to that economic value properly attributable to the patent's specific contribution over the prior art. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
You can spend $130 million a year advertising (Advantage Rent-a-Car v. [read post]