Search for: "Kelly v State"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
In New Doe Child #1 v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 7:26 am
Federal Housing Finance Agency, August 23, 2018, Kelly, J.). [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 11:08 am
In an Order last week in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 8:09 am
The case is Lewis v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:30 am
Strangely, the lawsuit, State of Washington et al. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 8:35 am
Three months ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
This paper considers an example from Australian colonial history, the case of the legendary outlaw Ned Kelly, which occurred at a critical juncture in the formation of state in Australia. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 11:37 am
In doing so, the Fifth Circuit distinguished a prior case, Lester v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 11:37 am
In doing so, the Fifth Circuit distinguished a prior case, Lester v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 11:37 am
In doing so, the Fifth Circuit distinguished a prior case, Lester v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:43 pm
Kelly Brothers Mason v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:23 pm
Frye & Kelly, P.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
In Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
In Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
In Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
Klemash, Kellie C. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Citing a recent decision by the Court of Appeals, Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli (30 NY3d 674, in which that court stated that "the requirement that a petitioner demonstrate that a condition was not readily observable in order to demonstrate an 'accident' is inconsistent with our prior case law," the Appellate Division annulled the Comptroller determination, explaining that "substantial evidence does not support the determination that the incident was… [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
” In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
