Search for: "Kind v. Superior Court" Results 681 - 700 of 1,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 480 U.S. 102 (1987), which any lawyer familiar with case names knows must have been from California. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:14 pm by Ad Law Defense
Kind, LLC., 1:15-cv-03699-WHP (S.D.N.Y.), Short et al v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:14 pm by Ad Law Defense
Kind, LLC., 1:15-cv-03699-WHP (S.D.N.Y.), Short et al v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
The matter came on for trial on 23 July 2014 in Person County Superior Court, the Honorable W. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:42 pm
Superior Court, the protesters arrested last week are being prosecuted in the U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:56 pm
Super Ct. 2000), and it is an unreported superior court decision from Connecticut. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:13 am by Jeff Welty
A superior court judge denied the motion and the defendant pled guilty, reserving his right to appeal the suppression issue. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:06 am by Howard Knopf
Equustek Solutions Inc.,[2017] 1 SCR 824, 2017 SCC 34  if anything already goes further than necessary to protect IP owners, including copyright owners and confirms the jurisdiction of superior courts to issue worldwide deindexing orders. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:01 pm
San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer has set a trial date in the Bay Guardian suit for mid-July. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
On June 21, 2010, a former seventeen-year PTL employee, Kristen Laforgia … filed a complaint seeking money damages in the Superior Court of New Jersey against Plaintiffs alleging gender discrimination, hostile work environment, retaliation, and assault and battery…. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
 (7) No offence shall be compounded if the accused is, by reason of a previous conviction, liable either to enhanced punishment or to a punishment of a different kind for such offence. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:43 am by Russell Jackson
  The court also held that the predominance and superiority requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) were met. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am by MOTP
Unless appellate courts come up with some grandfathering doctrine to exempt claims that would not have been time-barred before the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Agar Corp. v Electro Circuits. [read post]