Search for: "Lloyd v. Lloyd" Results 681 - 700 of 2,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm by Dru Stevenson
In May, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 4:37 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
On 6 December 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal in O’Connor v Bar Standards Board [2017] UKSC 78. [read post]
27 May 2008, 8:36 am
However, he endorsed the approach of the Court of Appeal (in Welex AG v Rosa Maritime Limited (“The Epsilon Rosa”) [2003] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 509), in which it was made clear that those restrictions do not come into play when one is considering a permanent anti-suit injunction, and of the Commercial Court (in Vale Do Rio Doce Navegacao S.A and another v Shanghai Bao Steel Ocean Shipping Co Ltd and another [2000] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1),… [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am by Ben Henriques, Corker Binning
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 8:50 am by Patrick McGinnis
Carriers and their lawyer cite the Hamilton1 case for the proposition that a nineteen-month delay in reporting a loss is, as a matter of law, not prompt and therefore prejudices the carrier from investigating the claim. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 10:43 pm by Donald Dinnie
  In Society of Lloyd’s v Price in re : Society of Lloyd’s v Lee 2006 5 SA 393 (SCA) the South African Supreme Court of Appeal dealt with the gap problem which arose in considering whether the English or South African law of prescription applied and followed the approach in Lourens v van Hohne 1993 2 SA 104 (UW). [read post]