Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
(ii) The Strike Out Appeal In Summers v Fairclough Homes [2012] UKSC 26, Lord Clarke held that that the court has power to strike out a statement of claim on the ground that the claim is an abuse of the process of the court at any time. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling, continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice system with it. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling, continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice system with it. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
[1] International Energy Group Limited v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2012] EWHC 69 (Comm) [2] Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20 [3] International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2013] EWCA Civ 39 [4] BAI (Run off) Ltd (In Scheme of Arrangement) and others v Durham and others [2012] 1 WLR 867 [5] Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 The post Case Preview: International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich… [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
The court’s unanimous judgement was issued by Lord Reed. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:00 pm
... 1997 (10 years ago today), Canada's Supreme Court held in Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:30 am
Lord Kerr highlighted that there was clearly a proximity of relationship between the respondent and Ms Michael. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am
The Supreme Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, with whom Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson agreed) unanimously allowed the Commissioner’s appeal. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:13 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Sumption giving the joint lead judgments stated that the fundamental principle is that the penalty rule regulates only the contractual remedy available for the breach of primary contractual obligations, and not the fairness of those primary obligations themselves. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
Supreme Court Rank was granted leave to appeal by the Supreme Court and the case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge on 21 April 2015, which can be viewed on demand on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 3:35 am
Lord Kitchin gave the judgment (with which the Justices agreed) and Lord Reed gave a concurring judgment. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:11 am
Lord Mance stated that the Court of Appeal had made an error of law by too closely assimilating the tort of invasion of privacy with a breach of confidence when it stated that “a claim for misuse of private information can and often will survive when information in is in the public domain. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:18 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rogers v R [2011] EWCA Crim 1459 (15 June 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV [2011] EWCA Civ 683 (16 June 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Culkin v The Wirral Independent Appeals Panel [2011] EWHC 1526 (QB) (15 June 2011) Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB) (16 June 2011) High Court (Family Division) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P… [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:24 am
OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
Lord Justice Arnold and Lord Justice Birss disagreed on the outcome, with the tie being broken by Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing, agreeing with Arnold LJ that the DABUS applications should be deemed withdrawn. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 2:13 am
State, 643 S.W.2d 709, 718 (Tex. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:46 am
State, 643 S.W.2d 709, 718 (Tex. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:46 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ahmed, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1949 (29 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Raggett v Society of Jesus Trust of 1929 for Roman Catholic Purposes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1002 (27 August 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) HM Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer Plc [2010] EWHC 2215 (Ch) (27 August 2010) High Court (Family Division) Re P [2010] EWHC 1592 (Fam) (13 May 2010) A Local Authority v A & Anor [2010]… [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
The Supreme Court recently handed down its judgment in the case of Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil & Gas Plc [2015] UKSC 71 (read our Case Preview here). [read post]
