Search for: "M/V Lord"
Results 681 - 700
of 914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2010, 2:08 am
Levine Samuel, LLP Gerald M. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
In the present case, however, as already set out at para 21 above, M does explain how he anticipates that his private life would be affected if his identity were revealed. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am
In a strict legal sense, prenuptial agreements have been regarded as just one factor that can be taken into account by a court when dividing assets under section 25 Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (as shown in M v M [2002] Fam Law 177 and K v K (Ancillary Relief) [2002] Fam Law 877). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm
‘It’s not like I’m killing someone now because there’s no lid for my jam [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:47 am
Dies ist angesichts der großen gesellschaftlichen Bedeutung von Kultur und Wissenschaft auch völlig angemessen. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:51 am
Lord Rodger explained: “In asserting their right to publish M’s name, the Press are not asking to be supplied with information which would otherwise not be available to them. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:15 pm
J M v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
NL – On process -v- merits, I’m not sure I see the distinction. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
I'm not saying for it to be removed from their record, but, the crime should be removed from public view and background checks, they should not have any more restrictions, shaming, etc. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:50 am
The same good Lord had a number of cameo roles in IP case; in one, he concurred with Lord Hoffmann in the celebrated House of Lords ruling in Synthon BV v SmithKline Beecham [2005] UKHL 59 (noted here by the IPKat), the paroxetine patent case which turned on issues of enabling disclosure. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:19 am
Although in the minority in Roberts Lord Bingham’s views must have coloured and informed the House of Lords when, after Lord Bingham’s retirement, they considered the approach to closed evidence in control order proceedings in AF (No.3) v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:11 am
Cat also submitted a nearly-invisible illustration (right) of two shirts, one bearing the legend" I'm appealing ... [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:03 am
v=Bkjv9SscotY [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:05 am
Readers may remember this dispute as Sun Microsystems Inc v M-Tech Data Ltd and another (noted by the IPKat here), but it has resurfaced today -- at a time when Court of Appeal judges should be out in the sun, not judging it -- as Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein [2010] EWCA Civ 997. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
ALTIERI On June 27, 2005, defendant Anthony M. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
The WSJ Law Blog excerpts this part of the opinion in American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:23 pm
I'm none the wiser but I am better informed. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:22 am
I'm never disposed to feeling empathy with Tory MPs (ex or otherwise) but David Ashby is in an entirely different category (particularly because, if you look at the Standing Committee debates on the Housing Bill 1995-6, he stood up a bit for housing and homelessness rights to the chagrin of other Tory members). [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:22 am
I'm never disposed to feeling empathy with Tory MPs (ex or otherwise) but David Ashby is in an entirely different category (particularly because, if you look at the Standing Committee debates on the Housing Bill 1995-6, he stood up a bit for housing and homelessness rights to the chagrin of other Tory members). [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:29 pm
I’m afraid this puts me in mind of judges dancing on the head of a pin. [read post]
