Search for: "MATTER OF R B" Results 681 - 700 of 14,568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2020, 3:32 am by CMS
In this post, James Warshaw, an associate in the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, previews the decision which is expected to be handed down tomorrow, 1 July 2020, in the matter of R v Hilton (Northern Ireland). [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:34 pm
The plaintiff in this matter is Natalia Fernandez. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 2:22 pm by Michael Williams and Regan Canfill
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 2:22 pm by Michael Williams and Regan Canfill
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As the Druckexemplar did in fact include page 6, and this was the legally binding text, the objections raised by the respondent-opponent under A 100(b) and A 123(3), based solely on the missing page 6, the appellant proprietor’s requests for correction under R 140 or amendment, as well as the ensuing discussion during the OPs before the Board concerning A 123(3)) and the Board’s finding above were from a substantive point of view legally unfounded (not having considered… [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:17 pm
" The Supreme Court of Texas today held the non-specification of the actual employer as a party to the arbitration agreement didn't matter. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:06 am by Dennis Crouch
The Patent Reform Act of 2011 (S. 23) was introduced on January 25, 2011 by Senator Leahy (D-VT) who was joined by eight co-sponsors (all from the Judiciary Committee) that include Senators Coons (D-DE), Franken (D-MN), Grassley (R-IA), Hatch (R-UT), Klobuchar (D-MN), Kyl (R-AZ), Lieberman (I-CT), and Sessions (R-AL). [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 1:08 pm
Very interesting district court decisions in the patent litigation context reaching opposite conclusions on teh question of whether a firm representing Client A in unrelated matters can represent a patent owner against party B where the patent owner, with other counsel, sues Client A. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:25 pm by Kish Law
“It’s a rainy night in Georgia” crooned Brook Benton in the 1970 R&B classic, which is fitting on this rainy Monday during this rainiest time of the year here in soggy Atlanta, Georgia. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:48 am
  In opposition, however, Allstate established, as a matter of law, that its coverage of L&B under the Allstate policy was excess to the coverage provided to L&B under the United policy. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 12:30 am by Máiréad Enright
We have hosted several posts detailing the judgment in A, B & C v. [read post]