Search for: "MURPHY v. STATE"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,295
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Murphy, a capital case in which the justices will decide whether Congress has disestablished the boundaries of an Indian reservation in Oklahoma, affecting the state’s ability to prosecute major crimes in the affected area. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 6:50 am
Compare, e.g., State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps weighs in on Carpenter v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
Carpenter v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 3:56 am
” At Law360 (subscription required), Michael Murphy analyzes the oral argument in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 4:44 am
., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:18 am
Loewy’s article Why Roe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 6:36 am
Thulen, et al v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
State Bar (1991), which are more easily upheld. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
” Dissent in United States v Ballard Chief Justice Harlan Stone authored a dissent, which was joined by Justices Black, Reed,Murphy, and Rutledge. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:56 am
Murphy v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 9:09 am
Murphy v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 9:09 am
Murphy v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Nieves v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:13 pm
Murphy (Tuesday, Nov. 27): Whether the 1866 territorial boundaries of the Creek Nation within the former Indian territory of eastern Oklahoma constitute an “Indian reservation” today Timbs v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 9:47 am
Judge Orrick also follows these and other federal court decisions in ruling that Section 1373 is unconstitutional under the Supreme Court's recent decision in Murphy v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 12:42 pm
” Murphy ultimately lost the Democratic primary to her male opponent proving that our state, like most others, still has work to do in confronting our gender biases if we are going to elect a woman to the highest level of executive office in our state. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 10:08 pm
In State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:06 pm
United States, which interpreted the Fourth Amendment to impose certain limits on the warrantless collection of the historical cell phone location records of a criminal suspect; (3) Murphy v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
Gundy v. [read post]
