Search for: "MYERS v. STATE"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 12:32 am
Myers BRONX COUNTYConsumer ProtectionApproval of Transfer of Structured Settlement Payments Granted; Transaction Fair, Reasonable Matter of 321 Henderson Receivables Origination LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
Myers U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 1:30 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:26 am
See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:29 am
Quinn line of cases] High court will hear new cases on limits of personal jurisdiction [Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:24 am
Myers, 461 U. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 11:15 am
Myer, 694 A.2d 264, 267 (N.J. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:40 am
I do not accept those submissions, which have been made and rejected in several other cases: see Myers v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm
Lockwood v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
In Aycock v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
In Bonner v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:41 am
As noted in this blog by Kevin LaCroix, perhaps a state attorney general will be the first to bring an action in the end. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:26 am
In Cadle v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 5:09 am
Such a measure would be preempted by state law. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316, 401–25 (1819) (same); Legal Tender Cases, 79 U.S. 457, 536–38 (1870) (paper money); Myers v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:52 am
Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983), and Pickering v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:26 am
Pickering’s balancing test applies only when the employee speaks “as a citizen upon matters of public concern” rather than “as an employee upon matters only of personal interest” [Connick v Myers, 461 US 138].5. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 2:03 pm
P. 12 based on Myers v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:50 am
: Reflections on Rasul v. [read post]