Search for: "Matter of A.D" Results 681 - 700 of 1,075
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2011, 6:10 am
Thus, in order to keep the Christians away from all the pagan rituals that was part of this worship of the sun, Bishop Liberius of Rome declared, in 354 A.D., that all Christians everywhere should celebrate the birth of our Lord on December 25... [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:55 am
It is important to recognize, however, that a bar which also serves food can be considered a restaurant for purposes of the statute [See, e.g., Matter of Point Lookout Civic Assn., 94 A.D.2d 744 (2d. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 5:50 pm
If a matter is not specifically addressed by the provisions within the separation agreement, then do not assume that they may be inferred from the separation agreement. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
Joyanna U. (64 A.D.3d 1092, 1093-1095 [2009] ) and Matter of Lewis v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 4:11 am by Jason Poblete
Done at the city of Washington, this 3d day of October, A.D. 1863, and of the Independence of the United States the eighty-eighth. ?? [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Jason
Memorandum: We previously held this case, reserved decision and remitted the matter to Supreme Court for compliance with Correction Law § 168-n (3), based on the court's failure "to set forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which it based its determination" (People v Long, 81 A.D.3d 1432, 1433). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
To the extent that the father's financial hardship was the result of his own wrongful conduct, he was not entitled to a reduction of his obligation to pay child support ( Matter of Knights v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
To the extent that the father's financial hardship was the result of his own wrongful conduct, he was not entitled to a reduction of his obligation to pay child support ( Matter of Knights v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Admin
Even assuming, arguendo, that additional records would have supported defendant's contention that he should not have been assessed points for category 12 on the RAI for refusal to participate in treatment, we conclude that his score under the RAI would nevertheless have remained at a level two (see generally People v Sherard, 73 A.D.3d 537, lv denied 15 N.Y.3d 707). . . [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:25 am
., 75 A.D.3d 718; 904 N.Y.S.2d 559; 2010, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on his 2401(1) claim while granting defendants' cross motion dismissing the claim holding that plaintiff's own negligent conduct was, as a matter of law, the sole proximate cause of his injuries. [read post]