Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2012, 2:58 am
It explains why the circuit split matters. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 10:38 am
See App. to Pet. for Cert.33a (decision of the Administrative Law Judge); id., at 15a (District Court opinion). [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am
Watson, 22-412Issue: Whether any amendment to a law originally adopted for an impermissible racially discriminatory purpose, no matter how minor the amendment and no matter the historical context, cleanses the law of its racist origins for 14th Amendment purposes unless the party challenging the law can prove that the amendment itself was motivated by racial discrimination. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:37 am
Defendant Google has filed a powerful cert petition, asking the U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:47 pm
The answer to that question should clearly be no.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
18 May 2013, 12:52 pm
The Solicitor General has recommended that cert. be denied. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:29 pm
Law Lessons from Estate of Claudia Cohen v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:17 am
But presumably the Justices are divided on the matter and so the question arises of how they should decide it. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit explained, “is investigating whether several individuals and entities have committed criminal violations of New York law. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:58 am
Jody Freeman is the Archibald Cox Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, and director of the law school’s Environmental Law Program. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:45 am
” Join the waitlist With search, summarization, and now interactive assistive features, Vincent AI can identify related documents from around the world in a matter of seconds, generating accurate summaries by generating headnotes and identifying the key legal issues, as well as answering research questions. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:04 pm
Supreme Court to address the issues presented—all of which, Cyan emphasizes, are questions of federal law. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
But if the three dissenters can persuade two of their colleagues that the discovery rule is incompatible with section 507(b), then damages for all copyright infringement actions would be limited to three years before the date the action is filed, and last week’s decision will be “a dead letter” as far as copyright law is concerned (although it would remain potentially important in other areas of law where the discovery rule is used). [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:06 am
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that “[t]he order … could be the end of the misconduct controversy as the decision upheld the conclusion of a special panel of judges from the U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:35 am
While this argument is obviously a compelling one as a policy matter, it's a lot more dubious as a matter of constitutional law, for reasons I try to suggest in my article (and which Judge Lamberth explains more succinctly in the district court decision in Munaf, and Judge Brown hints at in footnote 1 of her dissent in Omar). [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:02 am
The questions presented in the two petitions (cert. papers are available via this link) involve (1) the level of scrutiny appropriate for an equal protection challenge such as petitioners' and (2) whether a state licensing scheme such as Louisiana's, by imposing a categorical ban, is preempted by federal immigration law. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Yellow TransportationA Questions of Employment Law: Anti-harassment policy is the best defenseChaloult v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
Justice Ginsburg agreed, suggesting that the Court would not have granted cert. on a question that only applied to one defendant. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
As a constitutional law case, the decision tees up the question whether the purpose and effect prongs of the undue burden standard set forth in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:27 pm
” That sentence gets to the heart of the matter. [read post]
