Search for: "Matter of G. C. ," Results 681 - 700 of 4,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
GENERAL PROVISIONS 10.0 APPLICABILITY OF RULES (a) Applicability of Rules (b) Rules of Construction (c) Jurisdiction 10.1 EXCUSE FROM COMPLIANCE 10.2 PROBATE COURT INFORMATION (a) District Courts Hearing Probate Matters (b) Addresses and Telephone Numbers and Calendaring Information 10.3 PROBATE ATTORNEY'S NOTES (a) Probate Notes Available on the Web (b) Clearing Probate Notes (c) Updated Probate Notes (d) Failure to Clear Probate Notes 10.4 PROBATE… [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:27 pm by Marcel Pemsel
It will be interesting to see what the appointed Advocate General has to say and how the CJEU decides the matter. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the fourth and fifth causes of action asserted against the CMM defendants allege legal malpractice premised, respectively, on the CMM defendants’ failure to assert legal malpractice causes of action against C & G or to advise the executrix of the existence of legal malpractice causes of action against C & G, and to advise the executrix of the Farrell Fritz defendants’ legal malpractice in failing to recommend that a timely action be… [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 7:21 am by Steve Vladeck
Hardly the end of the matter, since CIA can still invoke the various exemptions to FOIA on remand. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:27 am by Administrator
Cook’s conduct in this matter. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:33 am
” A1 and A2 were found to infringe, but the B to G devices were not. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:00 am by K.O. Herston
Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment was vacated and the matter remanded for further findings. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 8:37 pm
As a preliminary matter, the Examiner noted that MPEP 715(II)(G) prohibits a swear-behind "where applicant has clearly admitted on the record that subject matter relied on in the reference is prior art." [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
" | Enlarged Board of Appeal in G 1/18 | Beyond exclusion of pharmaceutical products from patentable subject matter as a solution to limited access to medicines in Africa | ‘Cartography and Copyright’ | Warhol v Goldsmith: fairness of use by iconic artwork adjudicated in New York. | English High Court raises eyebrows over request to disclose ISP customer data | The EU Regulation on fairness in the platform economy is a let down for intellectual property | Vallenato… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:37 pm by robhealey
Below, the (A)(1)(a) section says that if the officer believes you are under the influence of alcohol he can charge you with a DUI no matter what level of alcohol is in your system. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
The Los Angeles Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of the company, concluding that the drivers were properly classified as a matter of law and not entitled to trial on their claims. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:46 am by Guest Author
If they are users’ speech, section 230(c)(1) protects Google (as YouTube’s parent company) from being treated as the publisher in causes of action, such as defamation, in which being a publisher matters. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
However, 22 NYCRR 202.16(g)(2) provides that in the discretion of the court, written expert reports may be used to substitute for direct testimony at the trial. [read post]