Search for: "Matter of Goods" Results 681 - 700 of 96,924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
 But no matter whether that decision is good or bad for future Republican candidates, maybe I am wrong that this will not have important impacts on the rest of  us. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 4:51 pm by Missouri Employment Law Letter
Unfortunately, no matter how genuine an employer’s good intentions are, they typically do not excuse it from discriminatory conduct. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:45 am by Mandelman
Mandelman Matters Presents: ARE YOU READING THIS STUFF? [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:01 am by Peter Vodola
 Frequent resort to sale of portions of the structured settlement [payments] at a deep discount is not a good use of this valuable asset . . . [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 7:07 pm
In this sense, Stone looks like a compromise between those scholars and jurists who wanted to elevate good faith to being part of a triad of fiduciary duties and those who did not, with the former losing as a matter of form, and the latter losing as a matter of substance.As to the duty of oversight, Stone confirmed former Chancellor William Allen's dicta in Caremark Int'l Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:24 am by Gregg Settembrino and Elizabeth Cowit
The Supreme Court found that the statute provided an absolute defense for compensation matters under the WHL for employers who prove that they acted in “good faith” and in “reliance on” certain actions by the Department or Division. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:24 am by Gregg Settembrino and Elizabeth Cowit
The Supreme Court found that the statute provided an absolute defense for compensation matters under the WHL for employers who prove that they acted in “good faith” and in “reliance on” certain actions by the Department or Division. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:24 am by Gregg Settembrino and Elizabeth Cowit
The Supreme Court found that the statute provided an absolute defense for compensation matters under the WHL for employers who prove that they acted in “good faith” and in “reliance on” certain actions by the Department or Division. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:38 pm by James Yang
The post USPTO REPORT ON PATENT ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER appeared first on I OC Patent Lawyer. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:38 pm by James Yang
The post USPTO REPORT ON PATENT ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER appeared first on OC Patent Lawyer. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:21 am
For slip and fall cases, plaintiffs' lawyers want the story to begin in a good way. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:00 am by Adrian Mark Baron
A gentleman came into my office today seeking help with his criminal matter. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:55 am by U.S.P.T.O.
Based on user input, including at a recent roundtable, the USPTO proposes to amend its current practice to permit amendments in limited circumstances to identifications of goods/services based on changes in the manner or medium by which products and services are offered for sale and provided to consumers due to evolving technology if the underlying content or subject matter has not changed. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:21 am
When I begin a matter involving a third-party website, the first step is to do a 'work-up,' that is to say, find out the domain name registrant, hosting service, etc. [read post]
19 May 2015, 11:25 am by Len Feltoon
Good Advice Helps the Case Small claims is a very busy bench. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:50 am by Len Feltoon
Quality Matters A little extra should be part of the services. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 6:55 pm by Larry
The "merely incidental" test comes from Section VII, Note 2, which states: "Except for the goods of heading 3918 or 3919, plastics, rubber, and articles thereof, printed with motifs, characters or pictorial representations, which are not merely subsidiary to the primary use of the goods, fall in chapter 49. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 10:41 am by Michael Lumer
Whatever one's thoughts about the dollar amount, it's a good deal for all sides. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am by Orin Kerr
 The common understanding was that all new decisions applied on direct appeal as a matter of retroactivity law. [read post]