Search for: "Mays v. Mays" Results 681 - 700 of 203,981
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2024, 6:42 am by Holly
 She may have priority over Bates if she can show first use in commerce prior to Bates’ priority date. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 6:04 am by jaxlawcenter
Additionally, small businesses may qualify for Chapter 5 Subchapter V, a streamlined version of Chapter 11 designed to make reorganization more accessible and less costly for smaller enterprises. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 5:40 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Limits on cross-examination — Sufficiency of evidence In May 2022, the State charged Alfonso A. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:53 am by Chukwuma Okoli
National and regional rules governing who may claim priority, whether a priority right may be divided or shared, whether it may be transferred independently of the priority application and the rights to the invention, and the requirements for a valid transfer differ from country to country. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:59 am by Bill Marler
While other systemic bacterial infections may result in adverse pregnancy outcomes at comparable frequencies, L. monocytogenes have notoriety because fetal complications largely occur in the absence of overt illness in the mother, delaying medical intervention. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:32 am by Alessandro Cerri
Other examples are where the further dealings might seriously damage the reputation of the trade mark (see Portakabin Ltd v Primakabin, Case C-588/08 and Viking Gas v Kosan Gas, Case C-46/10) or give the impression that there is a commercial connection between the person responsible for those dealings and the trade mark proprietor and, in particular, the impression that that person’s business is somehow affiliated to the trade mark proprietor or that there is a special… [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Matthew Chagares
Massachusetts’s highest court based its decision on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]