Search for: "Michael v. U. S"
Results 681 - 700
of 826
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2010, 6:11 am
,S. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
Grimm, Michael D. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 2:11 am
For claims within the Policy’s jurisdiction Panels have emphasized that decisions “should consist of more than, ‘It depends [on]what panelist you draw’,” Time Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
By Michael Diaz, Jr. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:29 am
Supreme Court’s June 24, 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:11 pm
Here is the abstract: In this brief essay, I try to draw some connections between the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Graham v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:33 am
Kelly, and will feature John Yoo, Professor of Law, Berkeley Law, U. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm
FLOYD and MICHAEL E. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 7:29 pm
” 28 U. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
CAFC: Bilski V. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
On March 5, 2010, Plaintiff filed a complaint to compel the U. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
It contains, among other things, articles on (i) the US Supreme Court’s damages analysis in Lucent v Microsoft from an economist’s perspective which proposes new guidelines for evaluating patent damages in concentrated, high tech industries and (ii) the evolution of quilts from utility items to works of art proposing strong copyright law protection for quilt designs. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 10:27 am
Michael recently published an article on a court ruling in CertainTeed Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
Former employees alleged they were the target of selective prosecution in administrative disciplinary actionBey v New York City Civil Service Commission, Supreme Court, Justice Madden, 2001 NY Slip Op 30058(U), [not officially reported]New York City conducted an investigation to determine which employees were claiming tax-exempt status or were claiming an excessive number of exemptions. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:53 pm
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
(SGI) v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
(v) The Actions of Senior Officers Lastly, and most controversially, we turn to the actions of the senior military commanders on Bloody Sunday. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
None of them: It is a serious and profitable business (IP tango) Brazil foresees a new Code of Civil Procedure (IP tango) Canada Copyright reform in Canada (IPblog) Pernicious permissions policies in Canada (Excess Copyright) Assessing Canada's new Copyright Bill: The video (Michael Geist) Canadian lawyers launch class action lawsuit against Thomson Reuters for copyright infringement (IP Osgoode) What’s your poison? [read post]
